Assessment framework to select sustainable storm water management options for urban areas

U. Pathirana, M. Peiris, A. Jayasinghe, P. Mahanama
{"title":"Assessment framework to select sustainable storm water management options for urban areas","authors":"U. Pathirana, M. Peiris, A. Jayasinghe, P. Mahanama","doi":"10.4038/bhumi.v7i2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid urbanization and land cover changes have increased the quantity of storm water flow in urban areas. In Sri Lanka, local authorities generally prefer conventional drainage solutions rather than providing innovative sustainable solutions in storm water management (SWM). Due to the lack of technological innovations and required standards, development plans prepared by local authorities have not been able to identify alternative practices for storm water management. Hence, this study focuses on the identification of effective and sustainable urban storm water management alternatives in the context of developing countries. Sustainable SWM alternatives that are identified through the literature have been classified under four main sectors i.e. Buildings, Open Spaces, Roads and Sideways. Evaluation is based on the comparative analysis between the existing SWM strategy and alternative SWM strategies under qualitative and quantitative criteria. Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) was utilized for the evaluation and the most suitable SWM alternative for urban areas has been selected based on equal weighting and experts’ aggregation weighting mechanism. The framework has been tested in the Homagama Divisional Secretariat Division (DSD), Sri Lanka which is one of the fast-growing urban localities in the Colombo District, Sri Lanka. This framework could be adopted for the evaluation of sustainable SWM alternatives for urban areas and is also a useful tool for planners engaged in the preparation of development plans.","PeriodicalId":439146,"journal":{"name":"Bhumi, The Planning Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bhumi, The Planning Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/bhumi.v7i2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and land cover changes have increased the quantity of storm water flow in urban areas. In Sri Lanka, local authorities generally prefer conventional drainage solutions rather than providing innovative sustainable solutions in storm water management (SWM). Due to the lack of technological innovations and required standards, development plans prepared by local authorities have not been able to identify alternative practices for storm water management. Hence, this study focuses on the identification of effective and sustainable urban storm water management alternatives in the context of developing countries. Sustainable SWM alternatives that are identified through the literature have been classified under four main sectors i.e. Buildings, Open Spaces, Roads and Sideways. Evaluation is based on the comparative analysis between the existing SWM strategy and alternative SWM strategies under qualitative and quantitative criteria. Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) was utilized for the evaluation and the most suitable SWM alternative for urban areas has been selected based on equal weighting and experts’ aggregation weighting mechanism. The framework has been tested in the Homagama Divisional Secretariat Division (DSD), Sri Lanka which is one of the fast-growing urban localities in the Colombo District, Sri Lanka. This framework could be adopted for the evaluation of sustainable SWM alternatives for urban areas and is also a useful tool for planners engaged in the preparation of development plans.
为市区选择可持续雨水管理方案的评估框架
快速的城市化和土地覆盖变化增加了城市地区的暴雨流量。在斯里兰卡,地方当局通常更喜欢传统的排水解决方案,而不是提供创新的雨水管理(SWM)可持续解决方案。由于缺乏技术创新和所需的标准,地方当局编制的发展计划未能确定雨水管理的替代做法。因此,本研究的重点是在发展中国家的背景下确定有效和可持续的城市雨水管理替代方案。通过文献确定的可持续SWM替代方案分为四个主要部分,即建筑物,开放空间,道路和侧面。评估是基于在定性和定量标准下对现有的SWM战略和备选的SWM战略进行比较分析。采用层次分析法(AHP)进行评价,基于等权和专家聚集权机制,选择出最适合城市区域的SWM方案。该框架已在斯里兰卡Homagama分部秘书处司(DSD)进行了测试,该司是斯里兰卡科伦坡地区快速发展的城市地区之一。这一框架可用于评价城市地区可持续的SWM备选办法,也是参与编制发展计划的规划人员的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信