Experience with Adalimumab Biosimilar in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis at our District General Hospital in Shropshire, United Kingdom

Amol Sagdeo, Anuja Sagdeo, R. Amarasena
{"title":"Experience with Adalimumab Biosimilar in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis at our District General Hospital in Shropshire, United Kingdom","authors":"Amol Sagdeo, Anuja Sagdeo, R. Amarasena","doi":"10.25259/vjim_10_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe main objective of this article was to share our experience with Idacio (adalimumab biosimilar) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).\n\n\n\nWe collected prospective data from the first 50 patients who were prescribed Idacio from September 2020 to August 2021. We collected their efficacy, and safety data from their subsequent visits up to 6 months. All the adverse events were recorded in our datasheet. As patients were not directly involved in the study, ethics committee approval was not needed for this study.\n\n\n\nOut of 25 RA patients, an adequate response was noted in 13 (54.2%) patients. Eleven (44%) of RA patients did not have any response to Idacio and one patient lost to follow-up due to moving out of the region hence account was closed for Idacio. Eight (57%) out of 14 patients with AS had an adequate response after Idacio treatment. Four (44.4%) out of nine patients with PsA had an adequate response and two patients with PsA lost to follow-up due to a change of address after only 1 month of treatment. Side effects noted in these 50 patients were facial rash in one patient, two patients had neutropenia (none of them had to stop the drug) and two patients had injection site pain initially on the first two injections. The patient with a severe facial rash had to stop the treatment.\n\n\n\nIdacio therapy was safe and effective in our cohort of patients with few side effects.\n","PeriodicalId":232453,"journal":{"name":"Vidarbha Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"10 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vidarbha Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/vjim_10_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this article was to share our experience with Idacio (adalimumab biosimilar) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We collected prospective data from the first 50 patients who were prescribed Idacio from September 2020 to August 2021. We collected their efficacy, and safety data from their subsequent visits up to 6 months. All the adverse events were recorded in our datasheet. As patients were not directly involved in the study, ethics committee approval was not needed for this study. Out of 25 RA patients, an adequate response was noted in 13 (54.2%) patients. Eleven (44%) of RA patients did not have any response to Idacio and one patient lost to follow-up due to moving out of the region hence account was closed for Idacio. Eight (57%) out of 14 patients with AS had an adequate response after Idacio treatment. Four (44.4%) out of nine patients with PsA had an adequate response and two patients with PsA lost to follow-up due to a change of address after only 1 month of treatment. Side effects noted in these 50 patients were facial rash in one patient, two patients had neutropenia (none of them had to stop the drug) and two patients had injection site pain initially on the first two injections. The patient with a severe facial rash had to stop the treatment. Idacio therapy was safe and effective in our cohort of patients with few side effects.
阿达木单抗生物类似药治疗类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎的经验
本文的主要目的是分享我们在类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者中使用Idacio(阿达木单抗生物类似药)的经验。我们收集了2020年9月至2021年8月期间服用Idacio的前50名患者的前瞻性数据。我们收集了他们随访至6个月的疗效和安全性数据。所有不良事件都记录在我们的数据表中。由于患者未直接参与本研究,因此本研究不需要伦理委员会的批准。在25例RA患者中,13例(54.2%)患者有适当的反应。11例(44%)RA患者对Idacio没有任何反应,1例患者因迁出该地区而失去随访,因此Idacio的账户被关闭。14例AS患者中有8例(57%)在Idacio治疗后有足够的反应。9名PsA患者中有4名(44.4%)有足够的反应,2名PsA患者在治疗仅1个月后由于地址改变而失去随访。在这50名患者中注意到的副作用是,1名患者出现面部皮疹,2名患者出现中性粒细胞减少症(他们都不必停药),2名患者在前两次注射时出现注射部位疼痛。患有严重面部皮疹的病人不得不停止治疗。在我们的患者队列中,Idacio治疗是安全有效的,副作用很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信