Genes and Stigma: The Connection Between Perceived Genetic Etiology and Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Illness

J. Phelan, Rosangely Cruz-rojas, M. Reiff
{"title":"Genes and Stigma: The Connection Between Perceived Genetic Etiology and Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Illness","authors":"J. Phelan, Rosangely Cruz-rojas, M. Reiff","doi":"10.1080/10973430208408431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An increased emphasis on biological causes of mental illness has been viewed as having the potential to significantly reduce stigma. From this perspective, the current genetics revolution can be seen as a source of hope with regard to reducing stigma. However, theory and empirical research suggest that biological attributions may have complex effects for stigma, reducing it along some dimensions while magnifying it along others. In a sample of 56 residents of New York City and Los Angeles, we assess the relationship between respondents' belief that schizophrenia (as described in a vignette) is influenced by genetic factors and several stigma-related beliefs and attitudes about the vignette subject. We find that respondents who believe the problem may be influenced by genetics are less likely to think the person did anything to cause the problem but also less likely to think the person can improve with appropriate help and more likely to think other family members may develop the same problem. These results suggest that the genetics revolution may have both positive and negative effects for the stigma of mental illness as it affects both ill individuals and their families. We suggest that it is important to attend to these effects because, at the present time, when genetic knowledge is accruing rapidly and the cultural response to these advances is evolving in turn, we may have an unusual opportunity to influence the public interpretation of and reaction to this knowledge in a way that will reduce rather than exacerbate the stigma of mental illness.","PeriodicalId":166369,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"108","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10973430208408431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

Abstract

Abstract An increased emphasis on biological causes of mental illness has been viewed as having the potential to significantly reduce stigma. From this perspective, the current genetics revolution can be seen as a source of hope with regard to reducing stigma. However, theory and empirical research suggest that biological attributions may have complex effects for stigma, reducing it along some dimensions while magnifying it along others. In a sample of 56 residents of New York City and Los Angeles, we assess the relationship between respondents' belief that schizophrenia (as described in a vignette) is influenced by genetic factors and several stigma-related beliefs and attitudes about the vignette subject. We find that respondents who believe the problem may be influenced by genetics are less likely to think the person did anything to cause the problem but also less likely to think the person can improve with appropriate help and more likely to think other family members may develop the same problem. These results suggest that the genetics revolution may have both positive and negative effects for the stigma of mental illness as it affects both ill individuals and their families. We suggest that it is important to attend to these effects because, at the present time, when genetic knowledge is accruing rapidly and the cultural response to these advances is evolving in turn, we may have an unusual opportunity to influence the public interpretation of and reaction to this knowledge in a way that will reduce rather than exacerbate the stigma of mental illness.
基因与病耻感:感知遗传病因学与对精神疾病的态度和信念之间的联系
越来越多的强调精神疾病的生物学原因已被视为具有显著减少耻辱的潜力。从这个角度来看,当前的遗传学革命可以被视为减少耻辱的希望之源。然而,理论和实证研究表明,生物学归因可能对柱头有复杂的影响,在某些方面减少它,而在其他方面放大它。在纽约市和洛杉矶的56名居民的样本中,我们评估了受访者认为精神分裂症(如小插图所述)受遗传因素影响的信念与对小插图主题的一些耻辱相关信念和态度之间的关系。我们发现,认为这个问题可能受基因影响的受访者不太可能认为这个人做了什么导致这个问题的事情,但也不太可能认为这个人可以在适当的帮助下改善,更可能认为其他家庭成员可能会出现同样的问题。这些结果表明,遗传学革命可能对精神疾病的耻辱有积极和消极的影响,因为它影响到患者和他们的家庭。我们建议关注这些影响是很重要的,因为目前,当遗传知识迅速积累,对这些进步的文化反应也在演变时,我们可能有一个不寻常的机会来影响公众对这些知识的解释和反应,以一种减少而不是加剧精神疾病的耻辱的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信