Challenges of Applying Question Method in Teaching and Learning Concepts in Psychological Sciences in the University

G. Okebiro
{"title":"Challenges of Applying Question Method in Teaching and Learning Concepts in Psychological Sciences in the University","authors":"G. Okebiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3135709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question is frequently used by all teachers in psychological science but also inadequately applied in teaching and learning psychological science. In question setting there are three important domains which constitute cognitive, affective and psycho motor. The two classification of cognitive and affective are known as taxonomy. Each domain therefore is organized in a hierarchical order meaning that within each domain exists organization in which it represents, which is known as levels. In cognitive domain there are six levels of knowledge that is knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis and synthesis and evaluation and on the affective domain involves five levels as follows; receiving, responding, valuing, organizing a value set and characterizing by values complex. There are some key terms used in each level. The problem lecturers do not set questions which test all the levels in cognitive and affective domains, so that learners can be able to answer concepts clearly and balancing knowledge and skills gained. The objective of the paper is to investigate whether lecturers use taxonomy in setting questions for learners in psychological sciences in the university level. The research adopts survey method by taking sample papers of social/psychological sciences in ten universities through convenience sampling technique. The key findings indicates that lecturers usually set questions which test knowledge and comprehension levels and do not set questions in application, analyzing and synthesis levels. These is shown through the commonly key terms used such as explain, list, name, what, differentiate, discuss and omitting key terms like apply, design, analyze, distinguish, determine, evaluate, illustrate and assess. It is therefore concluded that question method is not properly used or applied in teaching and learning psychological sciences. It is recommended that the lecturers to use taxonomy of setting questions to ensure that there reliability and validity testing and evaluating learners psychological sciences.","PeriodicalId":160212,"journal":{"name":"Social Sciences Education eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Sciences Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question is frequently used by all teachers in psychological science but also inadequately applied in teaching and learning psychological science. In question setting there are three important domains which constitute cognitive, affective and psycho motor. The two classification of cognitive and affective are known as taxonomy. Each domain therefore is organized in a hierarchical order meaning that within each domain exists organization in which it represents, which is known as levels. In cognitive domain there are six levels of knowledge that is knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis and synthesis and evaluation and on the affective domain involves five levels as follows; receiving, responding, valuing, organizing a value set and characterizing by values complex. There are some key terms used in each level. The problem lecturers do not set questions which test all the levels in cognitive and affective domains, so that learners can be able to answer concepts clearly and balancing knowledge and skills gained. The objective of the paper is to investigate whether lecturers use taxonomy in setting questions for learners in psychological sciences in the university level. The research adopts survey method by taking sample papers of social/psychological sciences in ten universities through convenience sampling technique. The key findings indicates that lecturers usually set questions which test knowledge and comprehension levels and do not set questions in application, analyzing and synthesis levels. These is shown through the commonly key terms used such as explain, list, name, what, differentiate, discuss and omitting key terms like apply, design, analyze, distinguish, determine, evaluate, illustrate and assess. It is therefore concluded that question method is not properly used or applied in teaching and learning psychological sciences. It is recommended that the lecturers to use taxonomy of setting questions to ensure that there reliability and validity testing and evaluating learners psychological sciences.
问题教学法在大学心理科学概念教学中的应用挑战
提问是教师在心理科学教学中经常使用的问题,但在心理科学的教学中却应用得不够充分。在问题设置中,有三个重要的领域构成认知运动、情感运动和心理运动。认知和情感的两种分类被称为分类学。因此,每个域以层次顺序组织,这意味着在每个域中存在它所代表的组织,这被称为级别。认知领域的知识分为知识、理解、应用、分析、综合和评价六个层次,情感领域的知识分为五个层次;接受、回应、评估、组织一个价值集合,并以价值为特征。每个级别都有一些关键术语。问题讲师不会设置测试认知和情感领域所有层次的问题,以便学习者能够清楚地回答概念并平衡所学的知识和技能。本文的目的是调查在大学水平的心理科学讲师是否使用分类法来为学习者设置问题。本研究采用问卷调查的方法,通过方便抽样的方法,选取了十所高校的社会/心理科学论文样本。主要调查结果表明,讲师通常设置知识和理解水平的问题,而没有设置应用、分析和综合水平的问题。这些是通过常用的关键术语,如解释、列表、名称、什么、区分、讨论和省略关键术语,如应用、设计、分析、区分、确定、评估、说明和评估来显示的。因此,问题教学法在心理科学教学中运用不当。建议教师采用分门别类的问题设置,以确保对学习者心理科学进行信度和效度的测试和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书