Perception of the Severity of COVID-19 Contagion in the Risk Group. A Comparative Study at the First and the Ninth Months of Compulsory Isolation.

M. Ceberio, Jesica Agostinelli, Gabriela Benedicto, Facundo Cocola, G. Jones, Marcos Díaz Videla, Carolina Calligaro, R. Daverio
{"title":"Perception of the Severity of COVID-19 Contagion in the Risk Group. A Comparative Study at the First and the Ninth Months of Compulsory Isolation.","authors":"M. Ceberio, Jesica Agostinelli, Gabriela Benedicto, Facundo Cocola, G. Jones, Marcos Díaz Videla, Carolina Calligaro, R. Daverio","doi":"10.52459/josstt23120122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the continued extension of the quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was proposed to investigate the perception of the severity of contagion in the risk group of the population. For this purpose, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out through the online distribution of surveys, consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire and questions related to the perception of the severity of the disease. Two comparative moments were considered: the first month and the ninth month of quarantine. The random sample consisted of 4268 individuals, of whom 1006 respondents stated that they were part of a risk group. Regarding the results, it was observed that although the perception of the risk of contagion decreased over the months, the highest risk remained \"very high\" (in the first month - 46.7 percent and in the ninth month - 38.5 percent), increasing the values of \"medium risk\" (in the first month - 20.4 percent; in the ninth month - 28.6 percent) and \"high risk\" (in the first month - 16.0 percent; in the ninth month - 20.8 percent). However, the difference was not statistically significant (the Wilcoxon rank test was applied and a value of p = 0.6 was obtained). In turn, the research allows us to compare the results with those of the perception of the population as a whole and compare the values of the risk group who contracted the virus, with whom they did not.","PeriodicalId":233572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Sciences: Transformations & Transitions","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Sciences: Transformations & Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52459/josstt23120122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the continued extension of the quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was proposed to investigate the perception of the severity of contagion in the risk group of the population. For this purpose, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out through the online distribution of surveys, consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire and questions related to the perception of the severity of the disease. Two comparative moments were considered: the first month and the ninth month of quarantine. The random sample consisted of 4268 individuals, of whom 1006 respondents stated that they were part of a risk group. Regarding the results, it was observed that although the perception of the risk of contagion decreased over the months, the highest risk remained "very high" (in the first month - 46.7 percent and in the ninth month - 38.5 percent), increasing the values of "medium risk" (in the first month - 20.4 percent; in the ninth month - 28.6 percent) and "high risk" (in the first month - 16.0 percent; in the ninth month - 20.8 percent). However, the difference was not statistically significant (the Wilcoxon rank test was applied and a value of p = 0.6 was obtained). In turn, the research allows us to compare the results with those of the perception of the population as a whole and compare the values of the risk group who contracted the virus, with whom they did not.
风险群体对COVID-19传染严重程度的认知强制隔离第一个月和第九个月的比较研究。
在新冠肺炎疫情持续延长隔离后,提出调查高危人群对疫情严重程度的认知。为此目的,通过在线分发调查进行了一项描述性横断面研究,调查包括社会人口调查问卷和与认识疾病严重程度有关的问题。考虑了两个比较时刻:隔离的第一个月和第九个月。随机样本由4268人组成,其中1006名受访者表示他们是风险群体的一部分。关于结果,我们观察到,尽管对传染风险的感知在几个月内有所下降,但最高风险仍然是“非常高”(第一个月- 46.7%,第九个月- 38.5%),增加了“中等风险”的值(第一个月- 20.4%;第9个月——28.6%)和“高风险”(第1个月——16.0%;第9个月(20.8%)。但差异无统计学意义(采用Wilcoxon秩次检验,p = 0.6)。反过来,这项研究使我们能够将结果与对整个人群的看法进行比较,并将感染病毒的风险群体与未感染病毒的风险群体的价值进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信