Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1

V. V. Trefilova, N. A. Shnayder, M. Novitsky, O. A. Ovdienko, Z. A. Nurgaliev
{"title":"Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1","authors":"V. V. Trefilova, N. A. Shnayder, M. Novitsky, O. A. Ovdienko, Z. A. Nurgaliev","doi":"10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.","PeriodicalId":414041,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.
患者报告的结果在成人背痛中的应用:第1部分
本研究的目的是对国内外最常用的用于急性和慢性背痛(BP)的量表和问卷的信息进行归纳。在以下数据库中进行了俄语和外国文献的分析,检索深度为5年(2016-2021):e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar。对于急慢性BP的诊断和动态过程特征的评估,可以使用标准化的研究:收集主诉、记忆、客观检查、神经状态评估以及有效的量表和问卷。为了及时诊断和监测患者BP的发展,提出了广泛的量表和问卷,按常规分为4组:用于评估BP患者生活质量的量表;评估BP疼痛特征的量表;用于评估BP患者预后的量表;评估BP残疾的量表。主题综述的第一部分分析了用于评估BP患者生活质量的量表的优点和缺点。这些评估BP患者生活质量的透视量表在世界神经学实践中很流行。有必要适应国内临床实践中使用的斯特拉特福德功能性背痛量表、疼痛相关残疾指数、腰痛影响患者评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信