Thermoeconomic Simulation of Cascaded and Integrated Vapor Compression-Absorption Refrigeration Systems

F. Carvalho, P. E. Barbieri
{"title":"Thermoeconomic Simulation of Cascaded and Integrated Vapor Compression-Absorption Refrigeration Systems","authors":"F. Carvalho, P. E. Barbieri","doi":"10.5380/RETERM.V20I1.80463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work is composed by a comparative thermoeconomic analysisbetween two refrigeration systems: Vapor Compression CascadeRefrigeration System (VCCRS) and Integrated Refrigeration System byAbsorption and Vapor Compression (VCACRS). The thermoeconomicanalysis compares the systems under energy, exergy, economic andenvironmental aspects. The development of mathematical models for each ofthe systems is performed through the EES (Engineering Equation Solver)program. The optimized functions are exergy destruction and total cost rate(sum of cost rates of investment, operation, maintenance and enviromental)by minimizing these functions. The optimization method used is theweighted sum of the objectives, this can be achieved by assigning differentweights for each goal, then a new function that represents the linearrelationship between all the objectives is found. In present case the twoobjective functions are exergy destruction and total cost rate. Inmultiobjective optimization, the process of choosing among optimizedsolutions involves the definition of an equilibrium point, also called theideal point. In order to achieve a real solution of the minimum values ofthe described functions simultaneously one must determine which is thesmallest distance from the ideal point to the curve that defines theoptimized solutions. In the study the economical advantage of VCCRS inrelation to VCACRS was demonstrated. VCACRS has a cost 10.26% lowerthan VCCRS while VCCRS has a better exergetic efficiency, with itsdestruction of exergy 38.46% lower than VCACRS.","PeriodicalId":106768,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/RETERM.V20I1.80463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work is composed by a comparative thermoeconomic analysisbetween two refrigeration systems: Vapor Compression CascadeRefrigeration System (VCCRS) and Integrated Refrigeration System byAbsorption and Vapor Compression (VCACRS). The thermoeconomicanalysis compares the systems under energy, exergy, economic andenvironmental aspects. The development of mathematical models for each ofthe systems is performed through the EES (Engineering Equation Solver)program. The optimized functions are exergy destruction and total cost rate(sum of cost rates of investment, operation, maintenance and enviromental)by minimizing these functions. The optimization method used is theweighted sum of the objectives, this can be achieved by assigning differentweights for each goal, then a new function that represents the linearrelationship between all the objectives is found. In present case the twoobjective functions are exergy destruction and total cost rate. Inmultiobjective optimization, the process of choosing among optimizedsolutions involves the definition of an equilibrium point, also called theideal point. In order to achieve a real solution of the minimum values ofthe described functions simultaneously one must determine which is thesmallest distance from the ideal point to the curve that defines theoptimized solutions. In the study the economical advantage of VCCRS inrelation to VCACRS was demonstrated. VCACRS has a cost 10.26% lowerthan VCCRS while VCCRS has a better exergetic efficiency, with itsdestruction of exergy 38.46% lower than VCACRS.
级联式和集成蒸汽压缩-吸收式制冷系统的热经济模拟
本文对蒸汽压缩级联制冷系统(VCCRS)和吸收-蒸汽压缩综合制冷系统(VCACRS)两种制冷系统进行了热经济学比较分析。热经济学分析从能源、能源、经济和环境等方面对系统进行了比较。每个系统的数学模型的开发是通过EES(工程方程求解器)程序执行的。通过最小化这些函数,优化的函数是火用破坏和总成本率(投资、运行、维护和环境成本率的总和)。所使用的优化方法是目标的加权和,这可以通过为每个目标分配不同的权重来实现,然后找到一个表示所有目标之间线性关系的新函数。在本例中,两个目标函数是能量破坏和总成本率。在多目标优化中,从最优解中进行选择的过程涉及到平衡点的定义,也称为理想点。为了同时获得所描述函数的最小值的实解,必须确定从理想点到定义优化解的曲线的最小距离。通过与VCACRS的比较,论证了VCCRS的经济优势。VCACRS的成本比VCCRS低10.26%,而VCCRS的火用效率更高,其火用破坏比VCACRS低38.46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信