MARAS: Signaling Multi-Drug Adverse Reactions

X. Qin, T. Kakar, Susmitha Wunnava, Elke A. Rundensteiner, Lei Cao
{"title":"MARAS: Signaling Multi-Drug Adverse Reactions","authors":"X. Qin, T. Kakar, Susmitha Wunnava, Elke A. Rundensteiner, Lei Cao","doi":"10.1145/3097983.3097986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing need for computing-supported methods that facilitate the automated signaling of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) otherwise left undiscovered from the exploding amount of ADR reports filed by patients, medical professionals and drug manufacturers. In this research, we design a Multi-Drug Adverse Reaction Analytics Strategy, called MARAS, to signal severe unknown ADRs triggered by the usage of a combination of drugs, also known as Multi-Drug Adverse Reactions (MDAR). First, MARAS features an efficient signal generation algorithm based on association rule learning that extracts non-spurious MDAR associations. Second, MARAS incorporates contextual information to detect drug combinations that are strongly associated with a set of ADRs. It groups related associations into Contextual Association Clusters (CACs) that then avail contextual information to evaluate the significance of the discovered MDAR Associations. Lastly, we use this contextual significance to rank discoveries by their notion of interestingness to signal the most compelling MDARs. To demonstrate the utility of MARAS, it is compared with state-of-the-art techniques and evaluated via case studies on datasets collected by U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","PeriodicalId":314049,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3097986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

There is a growing need for computing-supported methods that facilitate the automated signaling of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) otherwise left undiscovered from the exploding amount of ADR reports filed by patients, medical professionals and drug manufacturers. In this research, we design a Multi-Drug Adverse Reaction Analytics Strategy, called MARAS, to signal severe unknown ADRs triggered by the usage of a combination of drugs, also known as Multi-Drug Adverse Reactions (MDAR). First, MARAS features an efficient signal generation algorithm based on association rule learning that extracts non-spurious MDAR associations. Second, MARAS incorporates contextual information to detect drug combinations that are strongly associated with a set of ADRs. It groups related associations into Contextual Association Clusters (CACs) that then avail contextual information to evaluate the significance of the discovered MDAR Associations. Lastly, we use this contextual significance to rank discoveries by their notion of interestingness to signal the most compelling MDARs. To demonstrate the utility of MARAS, it is compared with state-of-the-art techniques and evaluated via case studies on datasets collected by U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
MARAS:多药物不良反应信号
越来越需要计算机支持的方法来促进药物不良反应(ADR)的自动信号传递,否则患者、医疗专业人员和药品制造商提交的数量激增的ADR报告中无法发现。在这项研究中,我们设计了一种多药物不良反应分析策略,称为MARAS,以表明由联合使用药物引发的严重未知不良反应,也称为多药物不良反应(MDAR)。首先,MARAS具有一种基于关联规则学习的高效信号生成算法,该算法可以提取非虚假的MDAR关联。其次,MARAS结合上下文信息来检测与一组adr密切相关的药物组合。它将相关关联分组到上下文关联集群(CACs)中,然后利用上下文信息来评估所发现的MDAR关联的重要性。最后,我们利用这种语境意义对发现的有趣程度进行排名,以表明最引人注目的mdar。为了证明MARAS的实用性,将其与最先进的技术进行比较,并通过对美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)收集的数据集的案例研究进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信