A comparison study of machine learning techniques for phishing detection

Jathin Kolla, Shinde Praneeth, Mirza Sameed Baig, G. Karri
{"title":"A comparison study of machine learning techniques for phishing detection","authors":"Jathin Kolla, Shinde Praneeth, Mirza Sameed Baig, G. Karri","doi":"10.36067/jbis.v4i1.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, phishing attacks have been increasing eventually. As the internet is developing, security for it is becoming a challenging task. Cyber-attacks and threats are increasing rapidly. These days many fake websites are created to deceive victims by collecting their login credentials, bank details, etc. Many anti-phishing products are launched into the market and use blacklists, heuristics, and visual and machine learning-based approaches, these products cannot prevent all the phishing attacks. However, unlike predicting phishing URLs, there are only a few studies that compare machine learning techniques in predicting phishing. The present study compares the predictive accuracy of several machine learning methods including Decision tree, Random forest, Multilayer Perceptions, Support Vector Machines, and XGBoost for predicting phishing URLs.","PeriodicalId":165070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Information Systems (e-ISSN: 2685-2543)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Information Systems (e-ISSN: 2685-2543)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v4i1.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last few years, phishing attacks have been increasing eventually. As the internet is developing, security for it is becoming a challenging task. Cyber-attacks and threats are increasing rapidly. These days many fake websites are created to deceive victims by collecting their login credentials, bank details, etc. Many anti-phishing products are launched into the market and use blacklists, heuristics, and visual and machine learning-based approaches, these products cannot prevent all the phishing attacks. However, unlike predicting phishing URLs, there are only a few studies that compare machine learning techniques in predicting phishing. The present study compares the predictive accuracy of several machine learning methods including Decision tree, Random forest, Multilayer Perceptions, Support Vector Machines, and XGBoost for predicting phishing URLs.
网络钓鱼检测中机器学习技术的比较研究
在过去的几年里,网络钓鱼攻击最终增加了。随着互联网的发展,互联网的安全正成为一项具有挑战性的任务。网络攻击和威胁迅速增加。如今,许多虚假网站通过收集用户的登录凭证、银行信息等来欺骗用户。许多反网络钓鱼产品进入市场并使用黑名单,启发式以及基于视觉和机器学习的方法,这些产品无法阻止所有的网络钓鱼攻击。然而,与预测网络钓鱼url不同,只有少数研究比较了预测网络钓鱼的机器学习技术。本研究比较了几种机器学习方法的预测准确性,包括决策树、随机森林、多层感知、支持向量机和XGBoost,用于预测网络钓鱼url。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信