Evidence-based timelines for project retrospectives — A method for assessing requirements engineering in context

E. Bjarnason, Richard Berntsson-Svensson, B. Regnell
{"title":"Evidence-based timelines for project retrospectives — A method for assessing requirements engineering in context","authors":"E. Bjarnason, Richard Berntsson-Svensson, B. Regnell","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective requirements engineering (RE) can support efficient development of successful products. However, assessing and improving how RE supports its context, i.e. the development life cycle, is non-trivial since many different roles and factors are involved over a long period of time. Project retrospectives may support project teams in reflecting on how requirements are agreed upon and communicated throughout a project. However, time is rarely taken for group reflection after project completion. Furthermore, project events may be recalled differently due to memory bias. We propose supporting project retrospective meetings by providing prepared evidence-based timelines visualizing the project history. The method was designed and evaluated in collaboration with a large telecommunications company using action research with the goal of assessing RE within the full development life-cycle. The initial evaluation results show that the method may support project retrospectives through fact-based memory recall and by enabling efficient and factual group discussions of RE in the context of the project life-cycle. In addition, some areas for improvement of the method have been identified, e.g. strengthened focus on expected outcome and clearer visual separation of evidence types.","PeriodicalId":335310,"journal":{"name":"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Effective requirements engineering (RE) can support efficient development of successful products. However, assessing and improving how RE supports its context, i.e. the development life cycle, is non-trivial since many different roles and factors are involved over a long period of time. Project retrospectives may support project teams in reflecting on how requirements are agreed upon and communicated throughout a project. However, time is rarely taken for group reflection after project completion. Furthermore, project events may be recalled differently due to memory bias. We propose supporting project retrospective meetings by providing prepared evidence-based timelines visualizing the project history. The method was designed and evaluated in collaboration with a large telecommunications company using action research with the goal of assessing RE within the full development life-cycle. The initial evaluation results show that the method may support project retrospectives through fact-based memory recall and by enabling efficient and factual group discussions of RE in the context of the project life-cycle. In addition, some areas for improvement of the method have been identified, e.g. strengthened focus on expected outcome and clearer visual separation of evidence types.
项目回顾的循证时间表——一种在环境中评估需求工程的方法
有效的需求工程(RE)可以支持成功产品的高效开发。然而,评估和改进RE如何支持其上下文(即开发生命周期)并非易事,因为在很长一段时间内涉及许多不同的角色和因素。项目回顾可以帮助项目团队反思需求是如何在整个项目中达成一致和沟通的。然而,在项目完成后,很少有时间进行小组反思。此外,由于记忆偏差,项目事件可能被不同地回忆。我们建议通过提供准备好的基于证据的项目历史可视化时间表来支持项目回顾会议。该方法是与一家大型电信公司合作设计和评估的,采用行动研究,目标是在整个开发生命周期内评估可再生能源。最初的评估结果表明,该方法可以通过基于事实的记忆回忆来支持项目回顾,并在项目生命周期的背景下实现有效和事实的可再生资源小组讨论。此外,还指出了该方法有待改进的地方,如加强对预期结果的关注和证据类型更清晰的视觉分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信