Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

Lawrence B. Solum
{"title":"Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause","authors":"Lawrence B. Solum","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1263885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The enigmatic phrase \"natural born citizen\" poses a series of problems for contemporary originalism. New Originalists, like Justice Scalia, focus on the public meaning of the constitutional text, but the notion of a \"natural born citizen\" was likely a term of art, derived from the idea of a \"natural born subject\" in English law - a category that most likely did not extend to persons, like John McCain, who were born outside sovereign territory. But the constitution speaks of \"citizens\" and not \"subjects,\" introducing uncertainties and ambiguities that might (or might not) make McCain eligible for the presidency.What was the original public meaning of the enigmatic phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of settled meaning: some cases of inclusion and exclusion seem indisputable. As a matter of inclusion, anyone born on American soil with an American parent is clearly a \"natural born citizen.\" As a matter of exclusion, anyone whose citizenship is acquired after birth as a result of \"naturalization\" is clearly not a \"natural born citizen.\" But these clear cases of inclusion and exclusion do not exhaust the possibilities. John McCain's citizenship was conferred by statute - perhaps before, but perhaps after his birth. That leaves John McCain in a twilight zone - neither clearly naturalized nor natural born.This Essay explores the contribution of originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation to the controversy over the meaning of the natural born citizenship clause. Part II of the Essay explains the relevance of originalist constitutional theory to the controversy with special reference to the New Originalism - the view of constitutional meaning that emphasizes public meaning of the constitutional text at the time each provision was framed and ratified. Part III argues that that the clause creates a problem for public meaning originalism - the phrase \"natural born citizen\" may not have had a widely shared public meaning in the late eighteenth century; the solution to this problem could be the notion of a \"term of art,\" in particular, the idea that the meaning of \"natural born citizen\" derives from the English concept of a \"natural born subject.\" Part IV considers the possibility that the original meaning of the natural born citizen clause is subject to an irreducible ambiguity. Part V concludes with reflections on the exemplary significance of the natural born citizen clause for constitutional theory.","PeriodicalId":362456,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1263885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The enigmatic phrase "natural born citizen" poses a series of problems for contemporary originalism. New Originalists, like Justice Scalia, focus on the public meaning of the constitutional text, but the notion of a "natural born citizen" was likely a term of art, derived from the idea of a "natural born subject" in English law - a category that most likely did not extend to persons, like John McCain, who were born outside sovereign territory. But the constitution speaks of "citizens" and not "subjects," introducing uncertainties and ambiguities that might (or might not) make McCain eligible for the presidency.What was the original public meaning of the enigmatic phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of settled meaning: some cases of inclusion and exclusion seem indisputable. As a matter of inclusion, anyone born on American soil with an American parent is clearly a "natural born citizen." As a matter of exclusion, anyone whose citizenship is acquired after birth as a result of "naturalization" is clearly not a "natural born citizen." But these clear cases of inclusion and exclusion do not exhaust the possibilities. John McCain's citizenship was conferred by statute - perhaps before, but perhaps after his birth. That leaves John McCain in a twilight zone - neither clearly naturalized nor natural born.This Essay explores the contribution of originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation to the controversy over the meaning of the natural born citizenship clause. Part II of the Essay explains the relevance of originalist constitutional theory to the controversy with special reference to the New Originalism - the view of constitutional meaning that emphasizes public meaning of the constitutional text at the time each provision was framed and ratified. Part III argues that that the clause creates a problem for public meaning originalism - the phrase "natural born citizen" may not have had a widely shared public meaning in the late eighteenth century; the solution to this problem could be the notion of a "term of art," in particular, the idea that the meaning of "natural born citizen" derives from the English concept of a "natural born subject." Part IV considers the possibility that the original meaning of the natural born citizen clause is subject to an irreducible ambiguity. Part V concludes with reflections on the exemplary significance of the natural born citizen clause for constitutional theory.
原旨主义与天生公民条款
神秘的“天生公民”一词给当代原旨主义提出了一系列问题。新原旨主义者,如大法官斯卡利亚,关注宪法文本的公共意义,但“天生公民”的概念可能是一种艺术术语,源于英国法律中“天生臣民”的概念——这一类别很可能不适用于像约翰·麦凯恩这样出生在主权领土以外的人。但是宪法说的是“公民”而不是“主体”,引入了不确定性和模糊性,这可能(也可能不)使麦凯恩有资格担任总统。确定美国总统职位资格的神秘短语最初的公开含义是什么?对于固定意义的核心有一个普遍的共识:一些包含和排除的案例似乎是无可争辩的。作为一个包容性问题,任何出生在美国土地上、父母是美国人的人显然都是“天生的公民”。作为一个排除问题,任何在出生后因“归化”而获得公民身份的人显然不是“天生的公民”。但这些明确的包容和排斥案例并没有穷尽所有的可能性。约翰·麦凯恩的公民身份是由法律赋予的——也许是在他出生之前,也许是在他出生之后。这使得约翰·麦凯恩处于一个模糊地带——既不是明确的入籍,也不是天生的。本文探讨了原旨主义作为一种宪法解释理论对“天生公民”条款含义争议的贡献。文章的第二部分解释了原旨主义宪法理论与争议的相关性,特别提到了新原旨主义-宪法意义的观点,强调宪法文本在每一条款被制定和批准时的公共意义。第三部分认为,该条款对公共意义原旨主义造成了一个问题——“天生公民”一词在18世纪晚期可能没有一个广泛共享的公共意义;这个问题的解决方案可能是“艺术术语”的概念,特别是“天生的公民”的含义源于英语中“天生的主体”的概念。第四部分探讨了自然出生公民条款的原意存在不可消除的歧义的可能性。第五部分总结了“天生公民”条款对宪法理论的示范意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信