The Effect of Goal Orientation on Auditors' Judgment Performance with the Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy

Fateme zare Bidokia, Zohreh Arefmanesh, Jamal Barzegari Khaneghah
{"title":"The Effect of Goal Orientation on Auditors' Judgment Performance with the Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy","authors":"Fateme zare Bidokia, Zohreh Arefmanesh, Jamal Barzegari Khaneghah","doi":"10.18502/jsbch.v7i1.12800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: auditors are required to make judgments in various fields, and their cognitive limitations lead to the deviation of their judgments. Goal orientation, which comes from the motivation of each person, as well as self-efficacy as another cognitive factor, can affect the way auditors’ judge. Therefore, this research examines the relationship between goal orientation and auditors' judgment performance, emphasizing the mediating role of self-efficacy. Methods: The statistical population of this research is auditors working in auditing institutes in Yazd and Isfahan provinces. In order to collect data, the auditors' standard performance questionnaires of Susetyo (2009), Elliot and McGregor's goal orientation questionnaire (2001) and Bell and Kozlowski's self-efficacy questionnaire (2002) were used. Results: The results of the structural equation modeling test in Amos software showed that out of the four dimensions of goal orientation, two dimensions of performance approach goal and mastery approach goal had a positive and significant relationship with auditors' self-efficacy and judgment performance. The two dimensions of mastery avoidance goal and performance avoidance goal had a negative and significant relationship with self-efficacy and the auditors' judgment performance, while self-efficacy had a positive and significant relationship with the auditors' judgment performance. Moreover, self-efficacy played a mediating role between the three dimensions of goal orientation, i.e. performance approach goal, performance avoidance goal and mastery avoidance goal, with the auditors' judgment performance. Conclusion: According to the research findings, it is important to pay attention to the auditors' psychological factors because these factors affect the auditors' judgment. This research helps companies and their audit committee to pay special attention to the psychological characteristics of auditors, including their goal orientation and self-efficacy in selecting an auditor.","PeriodicalId":414959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Behavior and Community Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Behavior and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jsbch.v7i1.12800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: auditors are required to make judgments in various fields, and their cognitive limitations lead to the deviation of their judgments. Goal orientation, which comes from the motivation of each person, as well as self-efficacy as another cognitive factor, can affect the way auditors’ judge. Therefore, this research examines the relationship between goal orientation and auditors' judgment performance, emphasizing the mediating role of self-efficacy. Methods: The statistical population of this research is auditors working in auditing institutes in Yazd and Isfahan provinces. In order to collect data, the auditors' standard performance questionnaires of Susetyo (2009), Elliot and McGregor's goal orientation questionnaire (2001) and Bell and Kozlowski's self-efficacy questionnaire (2002) were used. Results: The results of the structural equation modeling test in Amos software showed that out of the four dimensions of goal orientation, two dimensions of performance approach goal and mastery approach goal had a positive and significant relationship with auditors' self-efficacy and judgment performance. The two dimensions of mastery avoidance goal and performance avoidance goal had a negative and significant relationship with self-efficacy and the auditors' judgment performance, while self-efficacy had a positive and significant relationship with the auditors' judgment performance. Moreover, self-efficacy played a mediating role between the three dimensions of goal orientation, i.e. performance approach goal, performance avoidance goal and mastery avoidance goal, with the auditors' judgment performance. Conclusion: According to the research findings, it is important to pay attention to the auditors' psychological factors because these factors affect the auditors' judgment. This research helps companies and their audit committee to pay special attention to the psychological characteristics of auditors, including their goal orientation and self-efficacy in selecting an auditor.
目标取向对审计人员判断绩效的影响及自我效能感的中介作用
背景:审计人员需要在各个领域做出判断,其认知的局限性导致了其判断的偏差。目标导向来源于每个人的动机,而自我效能感作为另一个认知因素会影响审计人员的判断方式。因此,本研究考察目标取向与审计人员判断绩效之间的关系,强调自我效能感的中介作用。方法:本研究的统计对象为亚兹德省和伊斯法罕省审计机构的审计人员。为了收集数据,我们使用了Susetyo(2009)的审计人员标准绩效问卷,Elliot和McGregor的目标取向问卷(2001)和Bell和Kozlowski的自我效能问卷(2002)。结果:Amos软件结构方程建模检验结果显示,在目标取向的四个维度中,绩效趋近目标和掌握趋近目标两个维度与审计人员自我效能感和判断绩效存在显著的正相关关系。掌握回避目标和绩效回避目标两个维度与自我效能感和审计人员判断绩效存在负向显著相关,自我效能感与审计人员判断绩效存在正向显著相关。自我效能感在目标取向的三个维度(绩效接近目标、绩效回避目标和掌握回避目标)与审计人员的判断绩效之间起中介作用。结论:根据研究发现,关注审计人员的心理因素是非常重要的,因为这些因素会影响审计人员的判断。本研究有助于公司及其审计委员会特别关注审计师的心理特征,包括审计师在选择审计师时的目标取向和自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信