Fairness, Trust, Transparency, Equity, and Responsibility in Learning Analytics

M. Khalil, P. Prinsloo, Sharon Slade
{"title":"Fairness, Trust, Transparency, Equity, and Responsibility in Learning Analytics","authors":"M. Khalil, P. Prinsloo, Sharon Slade","doi":"10.18608/jla.2023.7983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning analytics has the capacity to provide potential benefit to a wide range of stakeholders within a range of educational contexts. It can provide prompt support to students, facilitate effective teaching, highlight aspects of course content that might be adapted, and predict a range of possible outcomes, such as students registering for more appropriate courses, supporting students’ self-efficacy, or redesigning a course’s pedagogical strategy. It will do all these things based on the assumptions and rules that learning analytics developers set out. As such, learning analytics can exacerbate existing inequalities such as unequal access to support or opportunities based on (any combination of) race, gender, culture, age, socioeconomic status, etc., or work to overcome the impact of such inequalities on realizing student potential. In this editorial, we introduce several selected articles that explore the principles of fairness, equity, and responsibility in the context of learning analytics. We discuss existing research and summarize the papers within this special section to outline what is known, and what remains to be explored. This editorial concludes by celebrating the breadth of work set out here, but also by suggesting that there are no simple answers to ensuring fairness, trust, transparency, equity, and responsibility in learning analytics. More needs to be done to ensure that our mutual understanding of responsible learning analytics continues to be embedded in the learning analytics research and design practice.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Learning analytics has the capacity to provide potential benefit to a wide range of stakeholders within a range of educational contexts. It can provide prompt support to students, facilitate effective teaching, highlight aspects of course content that might be adapted, and predict a range of possible outcomes, such as students registering for more appropriate courses, supporting students’ self-efficacy, or redesigning a course’s pedagogical strategy. It will do all these things based on the assumptions and rules that learning analytics developers set out. As such, learning analytics can exacerbate existing inequalities such as unequal access to support or opportunities based on (any combination of) race, gender, culture, age, socioeconomic status, etc., or work to overcome the impact of such inequalities on realizing student potential. In this editorial, we introduce several selected articles that explore the principles of fairness, equity, and responsibility in the context of learning analytics. We discuss existing research and summarize the papers within this special section to outline what is known, and what remains to be explored. This editorial concludes by celebrating the breadth of work set out here, but also by suggesting that there are no simple answers to ensuring fairness, trust, transparency, equity, and responsibility in learning analytics. More needs to be done to ensure that our mutual understanding of responsible learning analytics continues to be embedded in the learning analytics research and design practice.
学习分析中的公平、信任、透明、公平和责任
学习分析有能力为一系列教育背景下的广泛利益相关者提供潜在的好处。它可以为学生提供及时的支持,促进有效的教学,突出课程内容中可以调整的方面,并预测一系列可能的结果,例如学生注册更合适的课程,支持学生的自我效能感,或重新设计课程的教学策略。它将根据学习分析开发人员设定的假设和规则来完成所有这些事情。因此,学习分析可能会加剧现有的不平等,例如基于(任何组合)种族,性别,文化,年龄,社会经济地位等的不平等获得支持或机会,或者努力克服这些不平等对实现学生潜力的影响。在这篇社论中,我们介绍了几篇精选的文章,这些文章探讨了学习分析背景下的公平、公平和责任原则。我们将讨论现有的研究,并在这个特殊的部分中总结论文,以概述已知的内容,以及有待探索的内容。这篇社论的最后赞扬了这里所提出的工作的广度,但也表明,在学习分析中,确保公平、信任、透明、公平和责任没有简单的答案。我们需要做更多的工作,以确保我们对负责任的学习分析的相互理解继续嵌入到学习分析的研究和设计实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信