DBP-M: a technique for meeting end-to-end (m, k)-firm guarantee requirement in point-to-point networks

W. Lindsay, P. Ramanathan
{"title":"DBP-M: a technique for meeting end-to-end (m, k)-firm guarantee requirement in point-to-point networks","authors":"W. Lindsay, P. Ramanathan","doi":"10.1109/LCN.1997.630999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A real time message stream is said to have an (m, k) firm guarantee requirement if at least m out of any k consecutive messages from the stream must meet their deadlines to ensure adequate quality of service. M. Hamdaoui and P. Ramanathan (1995) recently proposed a scheduling policy called Distance based Priority Assignment (DBP) to better service multiple real time streams, each with its own (m, k) firm guarantee requirement. The key assumption in the DBP technique is that all messages reach their destination in one hop. This assumption, however, is not valid in most networks because there is often no direct connection between the source and the destination nodes of a real time stream. The DBP scheme is extended to deal with streams in which the messages traverse more than one hop in reaching their destination. Through empirical evaluation, it is also shown that this extended DBP scheme, called DBP-M, performs better than existing policies in reducing the probability of not meeting the (m, k) firm guarantee requirement.","PeriodicalId":286255,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.1997.630999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

A real time message stream is said to have an (m, k) firm guarantee requirement if at least m out of any k consecutive messages from the stream must meet their deadlines to ensure adequate quality of service. M. Hamdaoui and P. Ramanathan (1995) recently proposed a scheduling policy called Distance based Priority Assignment (DBP) to better service multiple real time streams, each with its own (m, k) firm guarantee requirement. The key assumption in the DBP technique is that all messages reach their destination in one hop. This assumption, however, is not valid in most networks because there is often no direct connection between the source and the destination nodes of a real time stream. The DBP scheme is extended to deal with streams in which the messages traverse more than one hop in reaching their destination. Through empirical evaluation, it is also shown that this extended DBP scheme, called DBP-M, performs better than existing policies in reducing the probability of not meeting the (m, k) firm guarantee requirement.
DBP-M:一种在点对点网络中满足端到端(m, k)公司保证要求的技术
如果来自实时消息流的任何k个连续消息中至少有m个必须满足其截止日期以确保足够的服务质量,则称实时消息流具有(m, k)可靠保证要求。m . Hamdaoui和P. Ramanathan(1995)最近提出了一种称为基于距离的优先级分配(DBP)的调度策略,以更好地服务多个实时流,每个流都有自己的(m, k)确定保证要求。DBP技术的关键假设是所有消息在一跳中到达目的地。然而,这种假设在大多数网络中是无效的,因为实时流的源节点和目标节点之间通常没有直接连接。DBP方案被扩展为处理消息在到达目的地时经过多个跃点的流。通过实证评估,还表明该扩展DBP方案(DBP- m)在降低不满足(m, k)公司担保要求的概率方面优于现有政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信