Utilization of Semantic Networks in the Teaching of Vocabulary

J. Dunn
{"title":"Utilization of Semantic Networks in the Teaching of Vocabulary","authors":"J. Dunn","doi":"10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I2/A07/DUNN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive neuroscience and psychology have shone light on new ways to help students learn, understand, and apply new vocabulary. The purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical method for the integration of semantic network utilization into the classroom. This paper will also introduce insights from Cognitive Linguistics as to how the brain best learns vocabulary. The method in this paper springs from the fields of psychology and neuroscience as well as inspiration from educators who are building new teaching styles. Semantic networks in the brain are the maps to understanding that hold the potential to make learning vocabulary more effective and meaningful. The purpose of the method detailed in this paper is to inspire other educators to incorporate cognitive linguistic insights into their classes as well as further the discourse on integrating this field into the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The method proposed in this paper is a theoretical model based on ideas such as Differentiated Instruction, emotionality in learning, cognitive linguistics, student schema, and semantic networks. While this method is not the result of direct collaboration with the educators mentioned within this paper, the author has implemented this method in his own classes at Teikyo University with success. Tomlinson’s differentiated instruction (1999) weighs heavily in this method, as it influences the core concept of playing to the student’s personal needs and interests during the course of an activity or lesson. This strategy combines well with Murphy’s (2012) NeuroEFL strategies that emphasize the connections between emotionally engaged students and higher learning potentials. Murphy (2012) stated that students who are engaged in and emotionally connected to the material being presented have a higher potential for learning and retaining new information. There also exists the real possibility that the way students see the world is different from their peers. The way one understands the meaning and contextual use of a vocabulary term, as a collection of understanding and use, is known as schema (Littlemore, 2012). These differences give teachers the unique opportunity to combine student experiences and thoughts while they are emotionally engaged in vocabulary activities. Recurring activation of existing and new connections to the core concept helps to cement a new term into the mind (Jenkins, 2012a; Lin, 1997; Roediger & McDermott, 1995). The theoretical method presented in this paper has been put into use by the author of this paper in university level classes with very good results, as measured by student satisfaction questionnaires and also against extensive reading vocabulary practice assessment scores. The author of this paper is currently collecting data in an action research to verify that this method provides benefits over other more traditionally accepted methods of vocabulary learning.","PeriodicalId":263152,"journal":{"name":"Language Education in Asia","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Education in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I2/A07/DUNN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience and psychology have shone light on new ways to help students learn, understand, and apply new vocabulary. The purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical method for the integration of semantic network utilization into the classroom. This paper will also introduce insights from Cognitive Linguistics as to how the brain best learns vocabulary. The method in this paper springs from the fields of psychology and neuroscience as well as inspiration from educators who are building new teaching styles. Semantic networks in the brain are the maps to understanding that hold the potential to make learning vocabulary more effective and meaningful. The purpose of the method detailed in this paper is to inspire other educators to incorporate cognitive linguistic insights into their classes as well as further the discourse on integrating this field into the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The method proposed in this paper is a theoretical model based on ideas such as Differentiated Instruction, emotionality in learning, cognitive linguistics, student schema, and semantic networks. While this method is not the result of direct collaboration with the educators mentioned within this paper, the author has implemented this method in his own classes at Teikyo University with success. Tomlinson’s differentiated instruction (1999) weighs heavily in this method, as it influences the core concept of playing to the student’s personal needs and interests during the course of an activity or lesson. This strategy combines well with Murphy’s (2012) NeuroEFL strategies that emphasize the connections between emotionally engaged students and higher learning potentials. Murphy (2012) stated that students who are engaged in and emotionally connected to the material being presented have a higher potential for learning and retaining new information. There also exists the real possibility that the way students see the world is different from their peers. The way one understands the meaning and contextual use of a vocabulary term, as a collection of understanding and use, is known as schema (Littlemore, 2012). These differences give teachers the unique opportunity to combine student experiences and thoughts while they are emotionally engaged in vocabulary activities. Recurring activation of existing and new connections to the core concept helps to cement a new term into the mind (Jenkins, 2012a; Lin, 1997; Roediger & McDermott, 1995). The theoretical method presented in this paper has been put into use by the author of this paper in university level classes with very good results, as measured by student satisfaction questionnaires and also against extensive reading vocabulary practice assessment scores. The author of this paper is currently collecting data in an action research to verify that this method provides benefits over other more traditionally accepted methods of vocabulary learning.
语义网络在词汇教学中的应用
认知神经科学和心理学为帮助学生学习、理解和应用新词汇提供了新的途径。本文旨在提出一种将语义网络整合到课堂教学中的理论方法。本文还将介绍认知语言学关于大脑如何最好地学习词汇的见解。本文的方法源于心理学和神经科学领域,也受到正在构建新教学方式的教育工作者的启发。大脑中的语义网络是理解的地图,它有可能使词汇学习更有效、更有意义。本文详细介绍的方法的目的是启发其他教育工作者将认知语言学的见解纳入他们的课堂,并进一步将这一领域纳入英语作为第二语言或外语教学的论述。本文提出的方法是一个基于差别化教学、学习情感、认知语言学、学生图式和语义网络等思想的理论模型。虽然这种方法不是与本文中提到的教育工作者直接合作的结果,但作者已经在他自己在帝京大学的课堂上成功地实施了这种方法。汤姆林森(Tomlinson)的差异化教学(1999)在这种方法中占有重要地位,因为它影响了在活动或课程过程中发挥学生个人需求和兴趣的核心概念。这一策略与Murphy(2012)的NeuroEFL策略结合得很好,后者强调情感投入的学生与更高的学习潜力之间的联系。Murphy(2012)指出,参与并与所呈现的材料产生情感联系的学生具有更高的学习和保留新信息的潜力。学生看待世界的方式也可能与同龄人不同。人们理解词汇术语的意义和上下文用法的方式,作为理解和使用的集合,被称为图式(Littlemore, 2012)。这些差异给教师提供了独特的机会,可以在学生情绪化地参与词汇活动时将他们的经历和想法结合起来。重复激活现有的和新的与核心概念的联系有助于将新术语巩固到脑海中(Jenkins, 2012a;林,1997;Roediger & McDermott, 1995)。本文提出的理论方法已被本文作者在大学水平的课堂上使用,无论是学生满意度问卷还是泛读词汇练习评估分数都取得了很好的效果。本文的作者目前正在收集一项行动研究的数据,以验证这种方法比其他更传统的接受的词汇学习方法有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信