Solidarity across Classes: The Swedish Employers' Mass Lockouts and the Spirit of Saltsjöbaden

Peter A. Swenson
{"title":"Solidarity across Classes: The Swedish Employers' Mass Lockouts and the Spirit of Saltsjöbaden","authors":"Peter A. Swenson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2961300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional thinking about the 1938 Basic Agreement at Saltsjobaden between organized labor and capital in Sweden holds that it was one of the consequences of a shift in the balance of power between workers and employers to the latter’s disadvantage. But detailed archival evidence and analysis shows that it was in fact part and parcel of an evolving cross-class alliance of unions and employer associations primarily in export and other traded goods sectors against militant and high-paid workers in sheltered sectors, especially the building and construction trades. Those relatively high wages were earned at the expense of workers producing traded goods, especially in engineering. Evidence about employers’ use of the multi-sectoral sympathy lockouts to bring both labor peace and cross-sectoral wage uniformity indicates that the unions dominating the labor confederation actually welcomed the militant interventions, whose main purpose was to give them a legitimate pretext to intervene against and discipline militancy and wage setting in the sheltered sectors. Details in and about the 1938 Basic Agreement confirm the argument about a growing cross-class alliance between capital and labor, not a shift in the balance of power.","PeriodicalId":378721,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2961300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional thinking about the 1938 Basic Agreement at Saltsjobaden between organized labor and capital in Sweden holds that it was one of the consequences of a shift in the balance of power between workers and employers to the latter’s disadvantage. But detailed archival evidence and analysis shows that it was in fact part and parcel of an evolving cross-class alliance of unions and employer associations primarily in export and other traded goods sectors against militant and high-paid workers in sheltered sectors, especially the building and construction trades. Those relatively high wages were earned at the expense of workers producing traded goods, especially in engineering. Evidence about employers’ use of the multi-sectoral sympathy lockouts to bring both labor peace and cross-sectoral wage uniformity indicates that the unions dominating the labor confederation actually welcomed the militant interventions, whose main purpose was to give them a legitimate pretext to intervene against and discipline militancy and wage setting in the sheltered sectors. Details in and about the 1938 Basic Agreement confirm the argument about a growing cross-class alliance between capital and labor, not a shift in the balance of power.
跨阶层的团结:瑞典雇主集体停工和Saltsjöbaden精神
关于1938年瑞典劳资双方在萨尔茨约巴登签订的基本协议,传统观点认为,这是工人和雇主之间的权力平衡向对后者不利的方向转变的后果之一。但详细的档案证据和分析表明,它实际上是工会和雇主协会组成的一个不断发展的跨阶级联盟的重要组成部分,主要是在出口和其他贸易商品部门,反对受保护部门(尤其是建筑和建筑行业)的激进和高薪工人。这些相对较高的工资是以生产贸易产品的工人为代价获得的,尤其是在工程领域。雇主利用多部门同情停工来实现劳工和平和跨部门工资统一的证据表明,主导劳工联盟的工会实际上欢迎激进的干预,其主要目的是给他们一个合法的借口来干预和约束受保护部门的战斗和工资设定。1938年《基本协定》的细节证实了一个论点,即资本和劳动之间的跨阶级联盟正在增长,而不是权力平衡的转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信