Comparison of Numerical Methods on Pricing of European Put Options

Lutfi Mardianto, Aditya Putra Pratama, A. R. Soemarsono, A. Hakam, E. Putri
{"title":"Comparison of Numerical Methods on Pricing of European Put Options","authors":"Lutfi Mardianto, Aditya Putra Pratama, A. R. Soemarsono, A. Hakam, E. Putri","doi":"10.12962/j24775401.v5i1.3172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Put option is a contract to sell some underlying assets in the future with a certain price. On European put options, selling only can be exercised at maturity date. Behavior of European put options price can be modeled by using the Black-Scholes model which provide an analytical solution. Numerical approximation such as binomial tree, explicit and implicit finite difference methods also can be used to solve Black-Scholes model. Some numerical methods are applied and compared with the analytical solution to determine the best numerical method. The results show that numerical approximations using the binomial tree is more accurate than explicit and implicit finite difference method in pricing European put options. Moreover when the value of T is higher then the error obtained is also higher, while the error obtained is lower when the value of N is higher. The value of T and N cause the increase of the computation time. When the value of T is higher the computation time is lower, while computation time is higher if the value of N is higher. Overall, the lowest computation time is obtained by using an explicit finite difference method with an exceptional as the value of T is big and the value of N is small. The lowest computation time is obtained by using a binomial tree method.","PeriodicalId":357596,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computing Science and Applied Mathematics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computing Science and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12962/j24775401.v5i1.3172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Put option is a contract to sell some underlying assets in the future with a certain price. On European put options, selling only can be exercised at maturity date. Behavior of European put options price can be modeled by using the Black-Scholes model which provide an analytical solution. Numerical approximation such as binomial tree, explicit and implicit finite difference methods also can be used to solve Black-Scholes model. Some numerical methods are applied and compared with the analytical solution to determine the best numerical method. The results show that numerical approximations using the binomial tree is more accurate than explicit and implicit finite difference method in pricing European put options. Moreover when the value of T is higher then the error obtained is also higher, while the error obtained is lower when the value of N is higher. The value of T and N cause the increase of the computation time. When the value of T is higher the computation time is lower, while computation time is higher if the value of N is higher. Overall, the lowest computation time is obtained by using an explicit finite difference method with an exceptional as the value of T is big and the value of N is small. The lowest computation time is obtained by using a binomial tree method.
欧式看跌期权定价数值方法比较
看跌期权是指在未来以一定价格出售标的资产的合约。在欧洲看跌期权上,卖出只能在到期日行使。欧式看跌期权的价格行为可以用Black-Scholes模型来建模,该模型提供了一个解析解。数值逼近法如二叉树法、显式和隐式有限差分法也可用于求解Black-Scholes模型。采用了几种数值方法,并与解析解进行了比较,以确定最佳数值方法。结果表明,在欧式看跌期权定价中,二项式树数值逼近法比显式和隐式有限差分法更准确。而且当T的值越大,得到的误差也越大,而当N的值越大,得到的误差越小。T和N的取值会导致计算时间的增加。T值越大,计算时间越短,N值越大,计算时间越长。总的来说,使用显式有限差分法计算时间最短,但在T较大,N较小的情况下例外。采用二叉树法获得了最短的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信