Doping in Sport - Should it be a Crime?

Tomas W Fitzgerald
{"title":"Doping in Sport - Should it be a Crime?","authors":"Tomas W Fitzgerald","doi":"10.53300/001c.6477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010 the National Rugby League discovered that the Melbourne Storm Rugby League club, had engaged in systematic breaches of the salary cap rules. Across 5 years the club paid players in various ways without disclosing those payments as required under the NRL’s rules. Additionally, those payments were covered up by doctored bookkeeping, and in some cases false statutory declarations about compliance with salary cap rules. In 2013 the Essendon Football Club was investigated by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority for its now notorious supplements program. That program involved the administration of purportedly performance enhancing substances to members of the playing group. The practice was widespread, systematic and involved non-compliance with ordinary record keeping practices, presumably to obscure which substances were taken when and by whom. Both of these are examples of systematic, deliberate cheating in sport, calculated to gain advantage over rivals. Both were punished severely by the administrators of the respective sporting codes. Yet despite these similarities, only the Essendon supplements scandal has been accompanied by serious and persistent calls for criminalization of the behavior underlying the cheating.","PeriodicalId":302064,"journal":{"name":"Sports Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2010 the National Rugby League discovered that the Melbourne Storm Rugby League club, had engaged in systematic breaches of the salary cap rules. Across 5 years the club paid players in various ways without disclosing those payments as required under the NRL’s rules. Additionally, those payments were covered up by doctored bookkeeping, and in some cases false statutory declarations about compliance with salary cap rules. In 2013 the Essendon Football Club was investigated by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority for its now notorious supplements program. That program involved the administration of purportedly performance enhancing substances to members of the playing group. The practice was widespread, systematic and involved non-compliance with ordinary record keeping practices, presumably to obscure which substances were taken when and by whom. Both of these are examples of systematic, deliberate cheating in sport, calculated to gain advantage over rivals. Both were punished severely by the administrators of the respective sporting codes. Yet despite these similarities, only the Essendon supplements scandal has been accompanied by serious and persistent calls for criminalization of the behavior underlying the cheating.
在体育运动中使用兴奋剂——它应该是一种犯罪吗?
2010年,国家橄榄球联盟(National Rugby League)发现墨尔本风暴橄榄球联盟(Melbourne Storm Rugby League)俱乐部系统性地违反了工资上限规定。在过去的5年中,俱乐部以各种方式支付球员,但没有按照NRL的规定披露这些支付。此外,这些付款是通过篡改簿记来掩盖的,在某些情况下,关于遵守工资上限规则的法定声明是虚假的。2013年,埃森登足球俱乐部(Essendon Football Club)因其臭名昭著的补药计划而受到澳大利亚体育反兴奋剂机构(Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority)的调查。该计划包括向比赛小组成员服用据称能提高成绩的物质。这种做法很普遍,很有系统,而且不遵守一般的记录保存做法,大概是为了模糊哪些物质是在何时由谁服用的。这两件事都是体育运动中有计划、故意作弊的例子,目的是在竞争中获得优势。两人都受到了各自体育法规的严厉处罚。然而,尽管有这些相似之处,只有埃森登补品丑闻一直伴随着严肃和持续的呼吁,要求将作弊背后的行为定为刑事犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信