In Search of Civic Virtue : On the Use of the Founders in Political Discourse

Patrick J. Akard
{"title":"In Search of Civic Virtue : On the Use of the Founders in Political Discourse","authors":"Patrick J. Akard","doi":"10.17161/STR.1808.5193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines three competing interpretations of the 'Founding Fathers' that were made in the contested political climate of the 1980s. The first is Marc Plattner's neoclassical economic interpretation that stresses Madisonian principles of law, property rights, and the danger of majoritarian rule to justify a minimal rule-based government and free market capitalism. The second is Robert Bellah's communitarian-democratic interpretation, which appeals to the Founders and our republican traditions to critique excessive individualism and advance a more democratic politics governed by the norms of civic virtue. The third approach considered is the anti-Federalist critique of the Founders by Sheldon Wolin, who sees in the Constitution the beginnings of a system of national capitalism and state power that undermined localized and democratic political culture. Each approach will be assessed for its contribution toward a more participatory notion of public life.","PeriodicalId":338053,"journal":{"name":"Social thought & research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines three competing interpretations of the 'Founding Fathers' that were made in the contested political climate of the 1980s. The first is Marc Plattner's neoclassical economic interpretation that stresses Madisonian principles of law, property rights, and the danger of majoritarian rule to justify a minimal rule-based government and free market capitalism. The second is Robert Bellah's communitarian-democratic interpretation, which appeals to the Founders and our republican traditions to critique excessive individualism and advance a more democratic politics governed by the norms of civic virtue. The third approach considered is the anti-Federalist critique of the Founders by Sheldon Wolin, who sees in the Constitution the beginnings of a system of national capitalism and state power that undermined localized and democratic political culture. Each approach will be assessed for its contribution toward a more participatory notion of public life.
追寻公民美德:论开国元勋在政治话语中的运用
本文考察了在20世纪80年代有争议的政治气候下对“开国元勋”的三种相互矛盾的解释。第一种是马克·普拉特纳(Marc Plattner)的新古典主义经济学解释,强调麦迪逊的法律原则、财产权和多数统治的危险,以证明最低限度的基于规则的政府和自由市场资本主义是合理的。第二种是罗伯特·贝拉(Robert Bellah)的社群民主解释,它呼吁开国元勋和我们的共和传统来批判过度的个人主义,推进一种由公民美德规范支配的更民主的政治。第三种观点是谢尔顿·沃林(Sheldon Wolin)对开国元勋的反联邦主义批评,他认为宪法是国家资本主义和国家权力体系的开端,破坏了地方和民主的政治文化。将评估每一种方法对公共生活更具参与性概念的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信