{"title":"O SENTIDO ESTÉTICO DA FORMAÇÃO DOCENTE E A CONSTITUIÇÃO DA AUTONOMIA","authors":"Marcia Serra Ferreira","doi":"10.17561/REID.N21.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn el presente articulo se plantea el problema de la formacion de profesores en el marco de la constitucion de sujetos activos en la produccion de conocimientos, asi como los mecanismos de dominacion culturales existentes en la realidad social. Se pretende analizar, a la luz de la Teoria Critica de la Escuela de Frankfurt, especialmente en Theodor W. Adorno, el sentido estetico de la formacion docente y la constitucion de la autonomia ante representaciones y mecanismos ideologicos y formas de incultura que inciden sobre la educacion, impidiendo la emancipacion de los sujetos. Se trata de un estudio bibliografico respaldado por las contribuciones de los teoricos Adorno y Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Costa (1986), Freud (2006, 2006a, 2006b), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochick (2011) y Jorge (2005).. La metodologia del trabajo se fundamenta en la relacion entre sujeto y objeto, universal y particular, con el fin de que no perduren visiones polarizadas e idealizadas en el proceso de formacion y de la autonomia del profesor. EnglishThe present article aims to problematize the training of teachers within the scope of formation of historically active individuals among the opposing forces of knowledge production and the mechanisms of cultural dominance presently in motion. The analysis will be conducted in light of the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, especially Adorno. This study (which seeks to contribute to research in education) requires a philosophical reflection in face of representations and ideological mechanisms that inhibit the observation of contradictions found in reality, that in turn, affect the relationship between learning and development in the process of stimulating teacher autonomy. The present piece is a bibliographical study based on the contributions of theorists Adorno and Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Freud (2006, 2006a, 2006b), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochik (2011) and Jorge (2005). The method considers psychoanalytic reflection in light of the critical theory on the building of subjectivities in relation to the objective universe. In this universe education and culture legitimize forms of barbarism and prevent the conception of a true education for the emancipation of historically aware and critical individuals. portuguesO presente artigo problematiza a formacao de professores, especificamente no âmbito da constituicao de sujeitos historicamente ativos em meio a producao de conhecimentos e aos mecanismos culturais de dominacao existentes na realidade social. Objetiva-se analisar, a luz da Teoria Critica da Escola de Frankfurt, especialmente com Theodor W. Adorno, o sentido estetico da formacao docente e a constituicao da autonomia diante de representacoes e mecanismos ideologicos e formas de barbarie que incidem sobre a educacao, impedindo a emancipacao dos sujeitos. Trata-se de um estudo bibliografico respaldado pelas contribuicoes dos teoricos Adorno e Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Freud (2006a, 2006b, 2006c), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochick (2011) e Jorge (2005). A metodologia do trabalho fundamenta-se na relacao entre sujeito e objeto, universal e particular, para que nao perdurem visoes polarizadas e idealizadas no processo de formacao do professor e da constituicao de sua autonomia.","PeriodicalId":273584,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia (REID)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia (REID)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/REID.N21.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEn el presente articulo se plantea el problema de la formacion de profesores en el marco de la constitucion de sujetos activos en la produccion de conocimientos, asi como los mecanismos de dominacion culturales existentes en la realidad social. Se pretende analizar, a la luz de la Teoria Critica de la Escuela de Frankfurt, especialmente en Theodor W. Adorno, el sentido estetico de la formacion docente y la constitucion de la autonomia ante representaciones y mecanismos ideologicos y formas de incultura que inciden sobre la educacion, impidiendo la emancipacion de los sujetos. Se trata de un estudio bibliografico respaldado por las contribuciones de los teoricos Adorno y Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Costa (1986), Freud (2006, 2006a, 2006b), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochick (2011) y Jorge (2005).. La metodologia del trabajo se fundamenta en la relacion entre sujeto y objeto, universal y particular, con el fin de que no perduren visiones polarizadas e idealizadas en el proceso de formacion y de la autonomia del profesor. EnglishThe present article aims to problematize the training of teachers within the scope of formation of historically active individuals among the opposing forces of knowledge production and the mechanisms of cultural dominance presently in motion. The analysis will be conducted in light of the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, especially Adorno. This study (which seeks to contribute to research in education) requires a philosophical reflection in face of representations and ideological mechanisms that inhibit the observation of contradictions found in reality, that in turn, affect the relationship between learning and development in the process of stimulating teacher autonomy. The present piece is a bibliographical study based on the contributions of theorists Adorno and Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Freud (2006, 2006a, 2006b), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochik (2011) and Jorge (2005). The method considers psychoanalytic reflection in light of the critical theory on the building of subjectivities in relation to the objective universe. In this universe education and culture legitimize forms of barbarism and prevent the conception of a true education for the emancipation of historically aware and critical individuals. portuguesO presente artigo problematiza a formacao de professores, especificamente no âmbito da constituicao de sujeitos historicamente ativos em meio a producao de conhecimentos e aos mecanismos culturais de dominacao existentes na realidade social. Objetiva-se analisar, a luz da Teoria Critica da Escola de Frankfurt, especialmente com Theodor W. Adorno, o sentido estetico da formacao docente e a constituicao da autonomia diante de representacoes e mecanismos ideologicos e formas de barbarie que incidem sobre a educacao, impedindo a emancipacao dos sujeitos. Trata-se de um estudo bibliografico respaldado pelas contribuicoes dos teoricos Adorno e Horkheimer (1985), Adorno (2009, 2008, 2000, 1995), Benjamin (2006), Freud (2006a, 2006b, 2006c), Kant (1992), Costa (1986), Crochick (2011) e Jorge (2005). A metodologia do trabalho fundamenta-se na relacao entre sujeito e objeto, universal e particular, para que nao perdurem visoes polarizadas e idealizadas no processo de formacao do professor e da constituicao de sua autonomia.
在这种情况下,教师的培训是在知识生产中积极主体的构成框架内进行的,以及在社会现实中存在的文化支配机制。目的分析,考虑到学校的理论批评法兰克福,尤其是在Theodor w .诺estetico意义上的教育编队飞行和constitucion范围向性能和ideologicos机制形式的无知,妨碍emancipacion教育问题影响受试者。本研究以阿多诺和霍克海默(1985)、阿多诺(2009,2008,2000,1995)、本杰明(2006)、科斯塔(1986)、弗洛伊德(2006,2006a, 2006b)、康德(1992)、科斯塔(1986)、克罗克(2011)和豪尔赫(2005)的理论贡献为基础。这项工作的方法论是基于主体和客体之间的关系,普遍的和特殊的,以避免两极分化和理想化的观点在教师的形成和自主过程中持续存在。本文旨在从历史上活跃个体在知识生产的对立力量和当前文化支配机制中形成的范围内对教师的培训提出问题。The analysis will be建都in light of The critical theory of The法兰克福学校,特别是装饰。本研究(寻求对教育研究作出贡献)需要对表象和意识形态机制进行哲学反思,这些表象和意识形态机制抑制了对现实中发现的矛盾的观察,进而影响了在刺激教师自主过程中学习与发展之间的关系。目前的作品是基于理论家阿多诺和霍克海默(1985)、阿多诺(2009,2008,2000,1995)、本杰明(2006)、弗洛伊德(2006,2006a, 2006b)、康德(1992)、科斯塔(1986)、克罗奇克(2011)和豪尔赫(2005)的贡献的书目研究。The method认为psychoanalytic reflection in light of The critical theory on The building of subjectivities有关目标宇宙。在这个宇宙中,教育和文化使各种形式的野蛮行为合法化,并防止为解放具有历史意识和批判精神的个人而进行真正教育的概念。本文讨论了教师的形成,特别是在知识生产和社会现实中存在的文化统治机制中历史活跃的主体的构成。摘要本研究旨在以法兰克福学派特别是阿多诺学派的批判理论为基础,分析教师教育的审美意义和自治的构成,以及以教育为中心、阻碍主体解放的意识形态机制和野蛮形式。这是一项文献研究,由理论家阿多诺和霍克海默(1985),阿多诺(2009,2008,2000,1995),本杰明(2006),弗洛伊德(2006a, 2006b, 2006c),康德(1992),科斯塔(1986),克罗克(2011)和豪尔赫(2005)支持。工作方法以主体与客体、普遍与特殊的关系为基础,在教师的形成过程中不存在两极分化和理想化的观点,也不存在教师自主性的构成。