Can STPA be used for a System-of-Systems? Experiences from an Automated Quarry Site

Stephan Baumgart, J. Froberg, S. Punnekkat
{"title":"Can STPA be used for a System-of-Systems? Experiences from an Automated Quarry Site","authors":"Stephan Baumgart, J. Froberg, S. Punnekkat","doi":"10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automation is becoming prevalent in more and more industrial domains due to the potential benefits in cost reduction as well as the new approaches/solutions they enable. When machines are automated and utilized in system-of-systems, a thorough analysis of potential critical scenarios is necessary to derive appropriate design solutions that are safe as well. Hazard analysis methods like PHA, FTA or FMEA help to identify and follow up potential risks for the machine operators or bystanders and are well-established in the development process for safety critical machinery. However, safety certified individual machines can no way guarantee safety in the context of system-of-systems since their integration and interactions could bring forth newer hazards. Hence it is paramount to understand the application scenarios of the system-of-systems and to apply a structured method to identify all potential hazards. In this paper, we 1) provide an overview of proposed hazard analysis methods for system-of systems, 2) describe a case from construction equipment domain, and 3) apply the well-known System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)f to our case. Our experiences during the case study and the analysis of results clearly point out certain inadequacies of STPA in the context of system-of-systems and underlines the need for the development of improved techniques for safety analysis of system-of-systems.","PeriodicalId":192753,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Automation is becoming prevalent in more and more industrial domains due to the potential benefits in cost reduction as well as the new approaches/solutions they enable. When machines are automated and utilized in system-of-systems, a thorough analysis of potential critical scenarios is necessary to derive appropriate design solutions that are safe as well. Hazard analysis methods like PHA, FTA or FMEA help to identify and follow up potential risks for the machine operators or bystanders and are well-established in the development process for safety critical machinery. However, safety certified individual machines can no way guarantee safety in the context of system-of-systems since their integration and interactions could bring forth newer hazards. Hence it is paramount to understand the application scenarios of the system-of-systems and to apply a structured method to identify all potential hazards. In this paper, we 1) provide an overview of proposed hazard analysis methods for system-of systems, 2) describe a case from construction equipment domain, and 3) apply the well-known System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)f to our case. Our experiences during the case study and the analysis of results clearly point out certain inadequacies of STPA in the context of system-of-systems and underlines the need for the development of improved techniques for safety analysis of system-of-systems.
STPA可以用于系统的系统吗?自动化采石场的经验
自动化在越来越多的工业领域变得普遍,因为它在降低成本方面的潜在好处,以及它们所带来的新方法/解决方案。当机器自动化并在系统的系统中使用时,有必要对潜在的关键场景进行彻底的分析,以得出适当的安全设计解决方案。PHA、FTA或FMEA等危害分析方法有助于识别和跟踪机器操作员或旁观者的潜在风险,并在安全关键机械的开发过程中得到完善。然而,安全认证的单个机器无法保证系统的安全,因为它们的集成和相互作用可能会带来新的危险。因此,了解系统的应用场景和应用结构化的方法来识别所有潜在的危险是至关重要的。在本文中,我们1)概述了提出的系统的危害分析方法,2)描述了一个来自建筑设备领域的案例,3)将众所周知的系统理论过程分析(STPA)应用于我们的案例。我们在个案研究和结果分析期间的经验清楚地指出,在系统的系统范围内,技术技术审查有某些不足之处,并强调需要发展改进的系统的系统的安全分析技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信