India’s Women Legal Academics: Who They Are and Where You Might Find Them

Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, R. Samuel
{"title":"India’s Women Legal Academics: Who They Are and Where You Might Find Them","authors":"Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, R. Samuel","doi":"10.5040/9781509923144.ch-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal institutions in India have historically been inhospitable sites for women (Mossman 2006; Sorabji 2010; Mishra 2016; Rajkotia 2017). Unlike the trend of increasing feminisation in legal professions around the world, women constitute less than 10% of all lawyers in India, a percentage that has not changed in the last half century (Michelson 2013; Ballakrishnen 2019). And outside a few small pockets of exceptionalism (Ballakrishnen 2017, 2018), systemic biases and gendered hierarchies continue to be relevant for today’s lawyer. Not that much is different in the legal academy: despite some recent increases in the gender ratios, Indian law schools are, and predominantly have been, led by male torchbearers. Men are more likely to be academic deans and vice-chancellors than women. Men are more likely to have tenure and be represented in academic councils. They are cited and referenced in the classroom more frequently – because they are both likely to be curating the teaching syllabi for these classrooms and because they are more likely to have written the books that are considered canonical for students of law. Together, this combined positionality has made the authoritative male voice, in the classroom and curriculum alike, not just predominant, but also ‘natural’.","PeriodicalId":441083,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Careers in the Legal Academy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Careers in the Legal Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923144.ch-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal institutions in India have historically been inhospitable sites for women (Mossman 2006; Sorabji 2010; Mishra 2016; Rajkotia 2017). Unlike the trend of increasing feminisation in legal professions around the world, women constitute less than 10% of all lawyers in India, a percentage that has not changed in the last half century (Michelson 2013; Ballakrishnen 2019). And outside a few small pockets of exceptionalism (Ballakrishnen 2017, 2018), systemic biases and gendered hierarchies continue to be relevant for today’s lawyer. Not that much is different in the legal academy: despite some recent increases in the gender ratios, Indian law schools are, and predominantly have been, led by male torchbearers. Men are more likely to be academic deans and vice-chancellors than women. Men are more likely to have tenure and be represented in academic councils. They are cited and referenced in the classroom more frequently – because they are both likely to be curating the teaching syllabi for these classrooms and because they are more likely to have written the books that are considered canonical for students of law. Together, this combined positionality has made the authoritative male voice, in the classroom and curriculum alike, not just predominant, but also ‘natural’.
印度女性法律学者:她们是谁,你可以在哪里找到她们
印度的法律机构历来对妇女不友好(Mossman 2006;Sorabji 2010;Mishra 2016;Rajkotia 2017)。与世界各地法律职业日益女性化的趋势不同,女性占印度所有律师的比例不到10%,这一比例在过去的半个世纪里没有改变(迈克尔逊2013;Ballakrishnen 2019)。除了少数例外主义(Ballakrishnen 2017, 2018)之外,系统性偏见和性别等级制度仍然与当今的律师相关。法律学院的情况也没有太大不同:尽管最近性别比例有所上升,但印度法学院的主要领导者一直是男性。男性比女性更有可能成为学院院长和副校长。男性更有可能获得终身教职,并在学术委员会中有代表。他们在课堂上被更频繁地引用和引用——因为他们都有可能为这些课堂策划教学大纲,也因为他们更有可能写过被法律学生认为是经典的书。总之,这种组合的地位使得权威的男性声音在课堂和课程中不仅占据主导地位,而且是“自然的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信