Comparative Assessment of The Fracture Resistance of Teeth Instrumented by Two Different Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems

Aliaa Elgendy
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of The Fracture Resistance of Teeth Instrumented by Two Different Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems","authors":"Aliaa Elgendy","doi":"10.33425/2639-9490.1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance exhibited by roots on instrumentation using two endodontic rotary systems: SANI S3 and EdgeEndo X7 rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars comprising single root canals were selected in this study. All specimens were decoronated and mounted perpendicularly in self-cure acrylic resin blocks exposing 6 mm of the roots out of the acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were divided into two experimental groups, according to NiTi rotary systems used and one control group (n = 20). After instrumentation, the specimens of both experimental groups were then filled using master Gutta-percha cones size 35 (0.04 taper) and obturation was done using continuous wave compaction technique. The specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 2 weeks to allow complete setting of the sealer. Root fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine (Instron) and the amount of load necessary for root fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). Statistics: Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Group C (control) exhibited the highest mean fracture force (357.13 ± 20.61) while group A (SANI S3) showed the lowest mean fracture force (192.60 ± 22.73). One-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between tested groups. Regarding inter-group comparisons using Tukey’s test, there was a significant statistical difference between groups (A and B) and between groups (A and C). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between groups (B and C). (P?0.05) Conclusion: 1-Root canal instrumentation with NiTi rotary files possessed a negative impact on roots and higher risks of root fractures compared to intact unprepared roots. 2-Design of NiTi files with improved cutting efficiency could diminish the risk of crack formation in root canal dentinal walls.","PeriodicalId":263229,"journal":{"name":"Oral Health and Dental science","volume":"324 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Health and Dental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance exhibited by roots on instrumentation using two endodontic rotary systems: SANI S3 and EdgeEndo X7 rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars comprising single root canals were selected in this study. All specimens were decoronated and mounted perpendicularly in self-cure acrylic resin blocks exposing 6 mm of the roots out of the acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were divided into two experimental groups, according to NiTi rotary systems used and one control group (n = 20). After instrumentation, the specimens of both experimental groups were then filled using master Gutta-percha cones size 35 (0.04 taper) and obturation was done using continuous wave compaction technique. The specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 2 weeks to allow complete setting of the sealer. Root fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine (Instron) and the amount of load necessary for root fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). Statistics: Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Group C (control) exhibited the highest mean fracture force (357.13 ± 20.61) while group A (SANI S3) showed the lowest mean fracture force (192.60 ± 22.73). One-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between tested groups. Regarding inter-group comparisons using Tukey’s test, there was a significant statistical difference between groups (A and B) and between groups (A and C). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between groups (B and C). (P?0.05) Conclusion: 1-Root canal instrumentation with NiTi rotary files possessed a negative impact on roots and higher risks of root fractures compared to intact unprepared roots. 2-Design of NiTi files with improved cutting efficiency could diminish the risk of crack formation in root canal dentinal walls.
两种不同镍钛旋转系统牙体检测的抗断裂性能比较
目的:本研究旨在比较两种根管旋转系统(SANI S3和EdgeEndo X7旋转文件系统)对根管内固定的抗骨折性。材料与方法:选取60颗新近拔除的含单根管的人下颌前磨牙为研究对象。将所有标本装饰并垂直安装在自固化丙烯酸树脂块中,露出丙烯酸树脂块外6mm的根部。根据使用的NiTi旋转系统将标本分为两个实验组和一个对照组(n = 20)。仪器测量完成后,两组实验标本均采用35(0.04锥度)古达-柏胶主锥体填充,并采用连续波压实技术进行封闭。标本在37°C和100%湿度下保存2周,以使密封剂完全定型。使用万能试验机(Instron)评估根断裂阻力,并以牛顿(N)记录根断裂所需的载荷。统计学:收集数据,制表并使用单因素方差分析和Tukey 's posthoc检验进行统计分析。结果:C组(对照组)平均断裂力最高(357.13±20.61),A组(SANI S3)平均断裂力最低(192.60±22.73)。单因素方差分析显示各组间差异有统计学意义。采用Tukey检验进行组间比较,a组与B组之间、a组与C组之间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:1根管内固定NiTi旋转锉对根管有负面影响,根管骨折风险高于未预备根管。2 .设计切削效率更高的镍钛锉,可降低根管牙本质管壁产生裂纹的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信