Assessing the Effects of Friend-to-Friend Texting onTurnout in the 2018 US Midterm Elections

Aaron Schein, Keyon Vafa, Dhanya Sridhar, Victor Veitch, Jeffrey M. Quinn, James Moffet, D. Blei, D. Green
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Friend-to-Friend Texting onTurnout in the 2018 US Midterm Elections","authors":"Aaron Schein, Keyon Vafa, Dhanya Sridhar, Victor Veitch, Jeffrey M. Quinn, James Moffet, D. Blei, D. Green","doi":"10.1145/3442381.3449800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent mobile app technology lets people systematize the process of messaging their friends to urge them to vote. Prior to the most recent US midterm elections in 2018, the mobile app Outvote randomized an aspect of their system, hoping to unobtrusively assess the causal effect of their users’ messages on voter turnout. However, properly assessing this causal effect is hindered by multiple statistical challenges, including attenuation bias due to mismeasurement of subjects’ outcomes and low precision due to two-sided non-compliance with subjects’ assignments. We address these challenges, which are likely to impinge upon any study that seeks to randomize authentic friend-to-friend interactions, by tailoring the statistical analysis to make use of additional data about both users and subjects. Using meta-data of users’ in-app behavior, we reconstruct subjects’ positions in users’ queues. We use this information to refine the study population to more compliant subjects who were higher in the queues, and we do so in a systematic way which optimizes a proxy for the study’s power. To mitigate attenuation bias, we then use ancillary data of subjects’ matches to the voter rolls that lets us refine the study population to one with low rates of outcome mismeasurement. Our analysis reveals statistically significant treatment effects from friend-to-friend mobilization efforts ( 8.3, CI = (1.2, 15.3)) that are among the largest reported in the get-out-the-vote (GOTV) literature. While social pressure from friends has long been conjectured to play a role in effective GOTV treatments, the present study is among the first to assess these effects experimentally.","PeriodicalId":106672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent mobile app technology lets people systematize the process of messaging their friends to urge them to vote. Prior to the most recent US midterm elections in 2018, the mobile app Outvote randomized an aspect of their system, hoping to unobtrusively assess the causal effect of their users’ messages on voter turnout. However, properly assessing this causal effect is hindered by multiple statistical challenges, including attenuation bias due to mismeasurement of subjects’ outcomes and low precision due to two-sided non-compliance with subjects’ assignments. We address these challenges, which are likely to impinge upon any study that seeks to randomize authentic friend-to-friend interactions, by tailoring the statistical analysis to make use of additional data about both users and subjects. Using meta-data of users’ in-app behavior, we reconstruct subjects’ positions in users’ queues. We use this information to refine the study population to more compliant subjects who were higher in the queues, and we do so in a systematic way which optimizes a proxy for the study’s power. To mitigate attenuation bias, we then use ancillary data of subjects’ matches to the voter rolls that lets us refine the study population to one with low rates of outcome mismeasurement. Our analysis reveals statistically significant treatment effects from friend-to-friend mobilization efforts ( 8.3, CI = (1.2, 15.3)) that are among the largest reported in the get-out-the-vote (GOTV) literature. While social pressure from friends has long been conjectured to play a role in effective GOTV treatments, the present study is among the first to assess these effects experimentally.
评估朋友间发短信对2018年美国中期选举投票率的影响
最近的移动应用技术让人们系统化地向朋友发送信息,敦促他们投票。在2018年美国最近一次中期选举之前,移动应用Outvote对其系统的一个方面进行了随机化,希望不引人注意地评估用户信息对选民投票率的因果影响。然而,正确评估这种因果关系受到多种统计挑战的阻碍,包括由于受试者结果测量错误而导致的衰减偏差,以及由于双方不遵守受试者分配而导致的低精度。我们通过剪裁统计分析来利用关于用户和受试者的额外数据来解决这些挑战,这些挑战可能会影响任何试图随机化真实的朋友间互动的研究。利用用户应用内行为的元数据,我们重建了主题在用户队列中的位置。我们使用这些信息来细化研究人群,使其更顺从,排在队列前列的受试者,我们以一种系统的方式来优化研究力量的代理。为了减轻衰减偏差,我们随后使用受试者与选民名册匹配的辅助数据,使我们能够将研究人群细化为结果误判率较低的人群。我们的分析显示,朋友对朋友的动员努力(8.3,CI =(1.2, 15.3))在统计上具有显著的治疗效果,这是在动员投票(GOTV)文献中报道的最大效果之一。虽然来自朋友的社会压力长期以来一直被推测在有效的GOTV治疗中发挥作用,但本研究是首次通过实验评估这些影响的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信