Plunger Fall Velocity Studies in Vertical Wells

R. Acosta, E. Pereyra, C. Sarica
{"title":"Plunger Fall Velocity Studies in Vertical Wells","authors":"R. Acosta, E. Pereyra, C. Sarica","doi":"10.2118/190949-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this study is to experimentally investigate the fall velocities of several type of plungers in various stagnant liquids and at different dynamic operating conditions. Six different plungers were evaluated, namely, new and used brush, new and used dual pad, new and used spiral, and new two piece type plungers. The experimental studies were carried out using two different facilities.\n First, a simple plunger setup was used to measure the fall velocity of different plungers. This experimental configuration allows the use of different liquids at stagnant conditions (water, water with flowing air and oil). The experimental results show that plunger fall velocity in water is about 4% of the plunger velocity in air. Under a bubbling column and for all plunger types, the fall velocity fluctuates as the air passes through the plunger yielding, in some cases, an average velocity similar to the water case. The fall velocities in low and medium viscosity oils are 60% and 42% of the average velocity in water, respectively. Second, a comprehensive experimental facility was designed and constructed to study the plunger under dynamic operating conditions (or cycles) and at different fluid pressures (air). When the plunger fall velocity was studied under a cyclic operating conditions, the resultant fall velocity is about 60% of the velocity observed in only air, but 30 times larger than the corresponding velocity in stagnant oil.\n Comparatively, the fastest conventional plunger is the spiral type, whereas the conventional sealing types (pad and brush) are the slowest ones. In addition, the effect of pressure is substantial and the fall velocity of the plunger rapidly decreases as the gas phase (air) pressure increases. Based on the experimental observations and data analysis, it was found that the fall velocity depends mainly on the type of plunger, air phase pressure, thickness of the liquid film on tubing wall, viscosity of the liquid, and density of the gas phase.\n Plunger lift is one of the most used deliquification method for gas wells. However, only a few experimental studies have been found in the literature. None of them attempt the comparison of different plungers. This study present a new set of data that helps to understand the behavior of the different types of plungers.","PeriodicalId":373819,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190949-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study is to experimentally investigate the fall velocities of several type of plungers in various stagnant liquids and at different dynamic operating conditions. Six different plungers were evaluated, namely, new and used brush, new and used dual pad, new and used spiral, and new two piece type plungers. The experimental studies were carried out using two different facilities. First, a simple plunger setup was used to measure the fall velocity of different plungers. This experimental configuration allows the use of different liquids at stagnant conditions (water, water with flowing air and oil). The experimental results show that plunger fall velocity in water is about 4% of the plunger velocity in air. Under a bubbling column and for all plunger types, the fall velocity fluctuates as the air passes through the plunger yielding, in some cases, an average velocity similar to the water case. The fall velocities in low and medium viscosity oils are 60% and 42% of the average velocity in water, respectively. Second, a comprehensive experimental facility was designed and constructed to study the plunger under dynamic operating conditions (or cycles) and at different fluid pressures (air). When the plunger fall velocity was studied under a cyclic operating conditions, the resultant fall velocity is about 60% of the velocity observed in only air, but 30 times larger than the corresponding velocity in stagnant oil. Comparatively, the fastest conventional plunger is the spiral type, whereas the conventional sealing types (pad and brush) are the slowest ones. In addition, the effect of pressure is substantial and the fall velocity of the plunger rapidly decreases as the gas phase (air) pressure increases. Based on the experimental observations and data analysis, it was found that the fall velocity depends mainly on the type of plunger, air phase pressure, thickness of the liquid film on tubing wall, viscosity of the liquid, and density of the gas phase. Plunger lift is one of the most used deliquification method for gas wells. However, only a few experimental studies have been found in the literature. None of them attempt the comparison of different plungers. This study present a new set of data that helps to understand the behavior of the different types of plungers.
直井柱塞下降速度研究
本研究的目的是实验研究几种类型的柱塞在不同的停滞液体和不同的动态操作条件下的下降速度。对新、旧刷柱塞、新、旧双垫柱塞、新、旧螺旋柱塞、新两片式柱塞进行了评价。实验研究是在两种不同的设备上进行的。首先,使用一个简单的柱塞装置来测量不同柱塞的下降速度。这种实验配置允许在停滞条件下使用不同的液体(水,带流动空气的水和油)。实验结果表明,柱塞在水中的下降速度约为柱塞在空气中下降速度的4%。在冒泡柱下,对于所有类型的柱塞,随着空气通过柱塞,下降速度会波动,在某些情况下,平均速度与水的情况相似。低粘度和中粘度油的下降速度分别为水中平均速度的60%和42%。其次,设计并建造了一个综合实验设施,对柱塞在动态工况(或循环)和不同流体压力(空气)下进行了研究。当研究柱塞在循环工况下的下降速度时,所得到的下降速度约为空气中观察到的速度的60%,但比停滞油中的相应速度大30倍。相比之下,传统柱塞的速度最快的是螺旋型,而传统密封类型(垫和刷)的速度最慢。此外,压力的影响是显著的,柱塞的下降速度随着气相(空气)压力的增加而迅速减小。通过实验观察和数据分析,发现柱塞类型、气相压力、管壁液膜厚度、液体粘度、气相密度等因素是影响柱塞下降速度的主要因素。柱塞举升是气井中最常用的液化方法之一。然而,文献中只有少数实验研究。他们都没有尝试比较不同的柱塞。这项研究提供了一组新的数据,有助于了解不同类型柱塞的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信