David and Goliath: Who Wins the Quantitative Battle?

John C. Bogle
{"title":"David and Goliath: Who Wins the Quantitative Battle?","authors":"John C. Bogle","doi":"10.3905/JPM.2016.43.1.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s hedge fund managers, armed with PhDs, complex algorithms, massive databases, and lightning-fast trading capabilities—and high costs—are the Goliaths of the financial industry. The humble index fund is the David of investing, armed only with simple arithmetic and a buy-and-hold strategy but free of the heavy weight of high fees and expenses. Does the underdog David of investing stand a chance against the imposing Goliath? Or does Goliath’s heavy cost burden give David the edge in the battle for superior returns? This article discusses the history of index investing and evaluates the relative success of hedge funds and broad-market index funds.","PeriodicalId":214661,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2016.43.1.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Today’s hedge fund managers, armed with PhDs, complex algorithms, massive databases, and lightning-fast trading capabilities—and high costs—are the Goliaths of the financial industry. The humble index fund is the David of investing, armed only with simple arithmetic and a buy-and-hold strategy but free of the heavy weight of high fees and expenses. Does the underdog David of investing stand a chance against the imposing Goliath? Or does Goliath’s heavy cost burden give David the edge in the battle for superior returns? This article discusses the history of index investing and evaluates the relative success of hedge funds and broad-market index funds.
大卫和歌利亚:谁赢了数量之战?
如今的对冲基金经理拥有博士学位、复杂的算法、庞大的数据库、闪电般的交易能力和高昂的成本,是金融业的巨人。不起眼的指数基金是投资界的大卫,只有简单的算术和买入并持有的策略,但没有高额费用和开支的沉重负担。在投资界处于劣势的大卫有机会对抗气势汹汹的歌利亚吗?还是歌利亚沉重的成本负担让大卫在争夺更高回报的战斗中占据优势?本文讨论了指数投资的历史,并对对冲基金和大盘指数基金的相对成功进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信