Patients Undergoing Gastric Cancer Surgery with Epidural Combined with General Anesthesia and General Anesthesia

M. Rahman, Md. Ashraful Anam, Zobaer Tanha, A. Akhter, M. A. Motin
{"title":"Patients Undergoing Gastric Cancer Surgery with Epidural Combined with General Anesthesia and General Anesthesia","authors":"M. Rahman, Md. Ashraful Anam, Zobaer Tanha, A. Akhter, M. A. Motin","doi":"10.36349/easjacc.2022.v04i03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity and adds significantly financial burden to patient and their family on healthcare. The incidence of gastric cancer continues to increase in Bangladesh; therefore there is unmet need of promising treatment modalities. Objective: To investigate the survival of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery with epidural combined with general anesthesia (EGA) and general anesthesia alone (GA). Methods: A retrospectively observation study was carried out at the Dept. of Anesthesia, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh from June 2021 March 2022. 451 patients with gastric cancer who were scheduled for radical resection. Propensity score matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between GA (n=75) and EGA (n=75) to reduce selection bias. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors significantly correlated with recurrence and/or metastasis and prognosis. The 3-year overall survival rates of patients receiving EGA and GA alone were compared. Results: After the propensity scores were matched, there were 75 patients who underwent EGA and 75 patients who underwent GA. For the entire population, reconstruction type, pN stage, and complications were significantly correlated with prognosis based on multivariate analyses. For patients with a recurrence and/or metastasis, lymphadenectomy and pN stage were shown to be independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In summary, patients might benefit from EGA as a result of better analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, fewer postoperative complications, higher safety, and a lower rate of metastasis and recurrence is conducive to postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer.","PeriodicalId":347630,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjacc.2022.v04i03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity and adds significantly financial burden to patient and their family on healthcare. The incidence of gastric cancer continues to increase in Bangladesh; therefore there is unmet need of promising treatment modalities. Objective: To investigate the survival of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery with epidural combined with general anesthesia (EGA) and general anesthesia alone (GA). Methods: A retrospectively observation study was carried out at the Dept. of Anesthesia, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh from June 2021 March 2022. 451 patients with gastric cancer who were scheduled for radical resection. Propensity score matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between GA (n=75) and EGA (n=75) to reduce selection bias. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors significantly correlated with recurrence and/or metastasis and prognosis. The 3-year overall survival rates of patients receiving EGA and GA alone were compared. Results: After the propensity scores were matched, there were 75 patients who underwent EGA and 75 patients who underwent GA. For the entire population, reconstruction type, pN stage, and complications were significantly correlated with prognosis based on multivariate analyses. For patients with a recurrence and/or metastasis, lymphadenectomy and pN stage were shown to be independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In summary, patients might benefit from EGA as a result of better analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, fewer postoperative complications, higher safety, and a lower rate of metastasis and recurrence is conducive to postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer.
硬膜外联合全麻和全身麻醉行胃癌手术的患者
背景:胃癌(GC)是导致死亡率和发病率的主要原因之一,给患者及其家庭的医疗保健增加了巨大的经济负担。孟加拉国的胃癌发病率持续上升;因此,对有希望的治疗方式的需求尚未得到满足。目的:探讨硬膜外联合全身麻醉(EGA)与单纯全身麻醉(GA)对胃癌手术患者的生存影响。方法:回顾性观察研究于2021年6月至2022年3月在孟加拉国达卡Mohakhali国家癌症研究所和医院(NICRH)麻醉科进行。451例胃癌患者行根治性手术。在GA (n=75)和EGA (n=75)之间按1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配,以减少选择偏差。单因素和多因素分析用于确定与复发和/或转移和预后显著相关的因素。比较单纯接受EGA和单纯接受GA患者的3年总生存率。结果:倾向评分匹配后,75例患者行EGA, 75例患者行GA。在整个人群中,基于多因素分析,重建类型、pN分期和并发症与预后显著相关。对于复发和/或转移的患者,淋巴结切除术和pN分期是独立的预后因素。结论:综上所述,EGA具有较好的镇痛和抗炎作用,术后并发症少,安全性高,转移复发率低,有利于胃癌患者术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信