Key challenges for hub and spoke models of care – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models

A. Bok, D. Noone, Naja Skouw-Rasmussen
{"title":"Key challenges for hub and spoke models of care – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models","authors":"A. Bok, D. Noone, Naja Skouw-Rasmussen","doi":"10.2478/jhp-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The hub and spoke model can deliver high quality care to a scattered population through centres of expertise supported by a network of several smaller geographically dispersed centres. This approach is now being proposed to provide care for people with rare diseases, and in particular for rare bleeding disorders. To ensure that specialised treatments such as gene therapy can be delivered effectively using the hub and spoke model of care, it is important to understand the challenges that the model presents for all stakeholders. Identifying key challenges As part of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models, 14 stakeholders representing health care providers, patient groups, research and industry met in November 2021 to identify challenges in the design, implementation and sustainable operation of hub and spoke models, and to propose ways in which resources could be allocated and collaboration fostered, from each of their stakeholder perspectives. Five key challenges were identified: 1. How future care might be re-envisioned; 2. Which agencies and stakeholders should determine which centres become hubs or spokes, and how this process might be carried out; 3. Identifying the criteria that will define a hub and spoke, and the roles of various stakeholders in that process; 4. How resources might be allocated; 5. How hubs and spokes will collaborate to ensure that patients' needs are prioritised. This model may also be recommended for treatment with gene therapy in certain rare diseases. Summary Hub and spoke models should be implemented by establishing criteria for hub and spoke status, prioritising patients in service reorganisation and in the care pathway, and considering the impact of new service models on current arrangements. The next step is to vet the challenges identified by this workstream with a broader group of external stakeholders and bring their perspectives back for consideration.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jhp-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The hub and spoke model can deliver high quality care to a scattered population through centres of expertise supported by a network of several smaller geographically dispersed centres. This approach is now being proposed to provide care for people with rare diseases, and in particular for rare bleeding disorders. To ensure that specialised treatments such as gene therapy can be delivered effectively using the hub and spoke model of care, it is important to understand the challenges that the model presents for all stakeholders. Identifying key challenges As part of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models, 14 stakeholders representing health care providers, patient groups, research and industry met in November 2021 to identify challenges in the design, implementation and sustainable operation of hub and spoke models, and to propose ways in which resources could be allocated and collaboration fostered, from each of their stakeholder perspectives. Five key challenges were identified: 1. How future care might be re-envisioned; 2. Which agencies and stakeholders should determine which centres become hubs or spokes, and how this process might be carried out; 3. Identifying the criteria that will define a hub and spoke, and the roles of various stakeholders in that process; 4. How resources might be allocated; 5. How hubs and spokes will collaborate to ensure that patients' needs are prioritised. This model may also be recommended for treatment with gene therapy in certain rare diseases. Summary Hub and spoke models should be implemented by establishing criteria for hub and spoke status, prioritising patients in service reorganisation and in the care pathway, and considering the impact of new service models on current arrangements. The next step is to vet the challenges identified by this workstream with a broader group of external stakeholders and bring their perspectives back for consideration.
轮辐式医疗模式面临的主要挑战——EHC智库关于轮辐式治疗模式的第一次研讨会报告
轮辐模式可以通过由几个较小的地理分散中心组成的网络支持的专业知识中心,为分散的人口提供高质量的护理。目前正提议采用这种方法为患有罕见疾病,特别是罕见出血性疾病的人提供护理。为了确保基因治疗等专门治疗能够有效地使用轮辐式护理模式,重要的是要了解该模式给所有利益相关者带来的挑战。作为EHC智库Hub and Spoke治疗模式工作流程的一部分,代表医疗保健提供者、患者群体、研究和行业的14名利益相关者于2021年11月举行会议,以确定Hub and Spoke模型的设计、实施和可持续运营方面的挑战,并从每个利益相关者的角度提出分配资源和促进协作的方法。确定了五个主要挑战:1。如何重新设想未来的护理;2. 哪些机构和利益攸关方应决定哪些中心成为枢纽或辐条,以及如何开展这一进程;3.确定将定义中心和辐条的标准,以及在此过程中各种利益相关者的角色;4. 如何分配资源;5. 中心和辐条如何协作以确保优先考虑患者的需求。该模型也可推荐用于某些罕见病的基因治疗。枢纽和轮辐模式应通过建立枢纽和轮辐地位标准,在服务重组和护理途径中优先考虑患者,并考虑新服务模式对当前安排的影响来实施。下一步是与更广泛的外部利益相关者一起审查该工作流程确定的挑战,并将他们的观点带回来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信