Conditions for Exact Hedging in an Unconstrained Regime-Switching Market Model

A. D. Gomes, A. Heunis
{"title":"Conditions for Exact Hedging in an Unconstrained Regime-Switching Market Model","authors":"A. D. Gomes, A. Heunis","doi":"10.1109/ICC54714.2021.9703166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an earlier contribution “Unconstrained hedging within a regime-switching market model” (Sixth Indian Control Conference, Hyderabad, December 18-20, 2019) the authors address the problem of unconstrained hedging in a financial market model which includes regime-switching, in the sense that the basic sources of randomness in the market model are a standard multidimensional Brownian motion, together with an independent finite-state Markov chain (the latter process models so-called regime-switches, which are occasional “large-scale” random changes in the market parameters, as opposed to the persistent “small-scale” changes in the market parameters which are driven by the Brownian motion). Under these conditions the market model is “incomplete”, and the best that one can do is establish existence of a least initial wealth along with an investment strategy for which the corresponding wealth process almost-surely majorizes - but generally does not equal - the contingent claim at close of trade (in this case the claim is said to be “super-hedged”). The goal of the present work is to complement this result and introduce natural conditions on the regime- switching model under which there exists a least initial wealth and an investment strategy such that the corresponding wealth almost-surely equals the contingent claim at close of trade (so that the claim is “exactly hedged”). Our motivation is primarily in the works of Cvitanic and Karatzas (1993) and El Karoui and Quenez (1995) who address the case where incompleteness in the market model arises from portfolio constraints rather than regime-switching.","PeriodicalId":382373,"journal":{"name":"2021 Seventh Indian Control Conference (ICC)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Seventh Indian Control Conference (ICC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC54714.2021.9703166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an earlier contribution “Unconstrained hedging within a regime-switching market model” (Sixth Indian Control Conference, Hyderabad, December 18-20, 2019) the authors address the problem of unconstrained hedging in a financial market model which includes regime-switching, in the sense that the basic sources of randomness in the market model are a standard multidimensional Brownian motion, together with an independent finite-state Markov chain (the latter process models so-called regime-switches, which are occasional “large-scale” random changes in the market parameters, as opposed to the persistent “small-scale” changes in the market parameters which are driven by the Brownian motion). Under these conditions the market model is “incomplete”, and the best that one can do is establish existence of a least initial wealth along with an investment strategy for which the corresponding wealth process almost-surely majorizes - but generally does not equal - the contingent claim at close of trade (in this case the claim is said to be “super-hedged”). The goal of the present work is to complement this result and introduce natural conditions on the regime- switching model under which there exists a least initial wealth and an investment strategy such that the corresponding wealth almost-surely equals the contingent claim at close of trade (so that the claim is “exactly hedged”). Our motivation is primarily in the works of Cvitanic and Karatzas (1993) and El Karoui and Quenez (1995) who address the case where incompleteness in the market model arises from portfolio constraints rather than regime-switching.
无约束制度转换市场模型中精确套期保值的条件
在早期的一篇文章“制度切换市场模型中的无约束套期保值”(第六届印度控制会议,2019年12月18日至20日,海德拉巴)中,作者解决了包括制度切换的金融市场模型中的无约束套期保值问题,因为市场模型中随机性的基本来源是标准的多维布朗运动,再加上一个独立的有限状态马尔可夫链(后一种过程模拟了所谓的制度转换,即市场参数偶尔的“大规模”随机变化,而不是由布朗运动驱动的市场参数持续的“小规模”变化)。在这些条件下,市场模型是“不完全的”,人们所能做的最好的事情就是建立最小初始财富的存在,以及一种投资策略,在这种策略中,相应的财富过程几乎肯定会使交易结束时的或有债权占多数(但通常不等于)(在这种情况下,这种债权被称为“超级对冲”)。本工作的目标是补充这一结果,并在制度转换模型上引入自然条件,在该模型下存在最小初始财富和投资策略,使得相应的财富几乎肯定等于交易结束时的或有债权(因此债权是“完全对冲的”)。我们的动机主要来自于Cvitanic和Karatzas(1993)以及El Karoui和Quenez(1995)的著作,他们研究了市场模型的不完全性源于投资组合约束而非制度转换的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信