Wind Tunnel Testing of Active Flow Control on the High Lift Common Research Model

John C. H. Lin, L. Melton, Judith A. Hannon, Marlyn Y. Andino, M. Koklu, K. Paschal, V. Vatsa
{"title":"Wind Tunnel Testing of Active Flow Control on the High Lift Common Research Model","authors":"John C. H. Lin, L. Melton, Judith A. Hannon, Marlyn Y. Andino, M. Koklu, K. Paschal, V. Vatsa","doi":"10.2514/6.2019-3723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 10%-scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL) and an Active Flow Control (AFC) version of the model equipped with a simple-hinged flap (CRM-SHLAFC) were successfully tested. The tests were performed in the 14by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The CRM-HL has a set of 37° inboard and outboard single-element Fowler flaps. The CRM-SHL-AFC has a set of 50° inboard and 55° outboard simple-hinged flaps equipped with integrated modular AFC cartridges on the flap shoulder. Both high-lift configurations share the same 30° slats and engine nacelle. Three new types of AFC devices were examined: the Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), the Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and the High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used a combination of unsteady and steady jets, to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients while minimizing the mass flow usage. Nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow consumption and the power coefficient, which takes account of both supply air pressure and mass flow usage for the actuators, were used for judging the performance efficiency of the AFC devices. A prestall lift performance degradation for the CRM-HL configuration was resolved with a properly placed nacelle chine. The configuration with nacelle chine was chosen as the representative reference conventional high-lift case for comparison with the CRMSHL-AFC. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment (DCL) was maintained for the entire lift curve over the CRM-SHL-AFC case with no AFC for almost all flow-control cases examined. The lift curve of the reference CRM-HL have a slightly steeper slope compared to those of the CRM-SHL-AFC configurations. The HELP actuation concept was extremely effective in controlling flow separation in the “linear region” of the curves comparing lift coefficient to mass flow rate. The HELP actuation achieved a targeted DCL of 0.50 using a moderate amount of mass flow and supply air pressure. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was able to match or exceed the lift performance of the reference conventional high-lift configuration (i.e., CRM-HL equipped with a nacelle chine), thus meeting the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project goal.","PeriodicalId":384114,"journal":{"name":"AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

A 10%-scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL) and an Active Flow Control (AFC) version of the model equipped with a simple-hinged flap (CRM-SHLAFC) were successfully tested. The tests were performed in the 14by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The CRM-HL has a set of 37° inboard and outboard single-element Fowler flaps. The CRM-SHL-AFC has a set of 50° inboard and 55° outboard simple-hinged flaps equipped with integrated modular AFC cartridges on the flap shoulder. Both high-lift configurations share the same 30° slats and engine nacelle. Three new types of AFC devices were examined: the Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), the Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and the High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used a combination of unsteady and steady jets, to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients while minimizing the mass flow usage. Nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow consumption and the power coefficient, which takes account of both supply air pressure and mass flow usage for the actuators, were used for judging the performance efficiency of the AFC devices. A prestall lift performance degradation for the CRM-HL configuration was resolved with a properly placed nacelle chine. The configuration with nacelle chine was chosen as the representative reference conventional high-lift case for comparison with the CRMSHL-AFC. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment (DCL) was maintained for the entire lift curve over the CRM-SHL-AFC case with no AFC for almost all flow-control cases examined. The lift curve of the reference CRM-HL have a slightly steeper slope compared to those of the CRM-SHL-AFC configurations. The HELP actuation concept was extremely effective in controlling flow separation in the “linear region” of the curves comparing lift coefficient to mass flow rate. The HELP actuation achieved a targeted DCL of 0.50 using a moderate amount of mass flow and supply air pressure. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was able to match or exceed the lift performance of the reference conventional high-lift configuration (i.e., CRM-HL equipped with a nacelle chine), thus meeting the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project goal.
大扬程通用模型主动流控风洞试验研究
通用研究模型(CRM-HL)的10%比例高升力版本和配备简单铰链襟翼(CRM-SHLAFC)的主动流量控制(AFC)版本成功进行了测试。测试是在美国宇航局兰利研究中心(LaRC)的14 × 22英尺亚音速隧道(14 × 22)中进行的。CRM-HL有一组37°的板内和板外单元素福勒襟翼。CRM-SHL-AFC有一套50°板内和55°板外简单铰链襟翼,在襟翼肩上配备集成模块化AFC弹药盒。这两种高升力配置共享相同的30°板和发动机舱。研究了三种新型AFC装置:双排扫描射流(DRSWJ)、交替脉冲射流(APJ)和高效低功耗(HELP)致动器。DRSWJ和APJ执行器使用两排非定常射流,而HELP执行器使用非定常和定常射流的组合,以克服强大的逆压梯度,同时最大限度地减少质量流量的使用。利用喷嘴压力比、质量流量消耗和功率系数(考虑了执行器的供气压力和质量流量的使用)来判断AFC装置的性能效率。CRM-HL配置的预失速升力性能下降问题通过适当放置短舱发动机得以解决。选择带短舱机的配置作为典型参考常规大扬程机匣,与CRMSHL-AFC进行比较。AFC诱导的升力系数增量(DCL)在CRM-SHL-AFC情况下的整个升力曲线上保持不变,几乎所有流动控制情况下都没有AFC。参考CRM-HL的升力曲线斜率比CRM-SHL-AFC的略陡。HELP驱动概念在升力系数与质量流量对比曲线的“线性区域”控制流动分离非常有效。使用适量的质量流量和供气压力,HELP驱动实现了0.50的目标DCL。配备HELP驱动的CRM-SHL-AFC配置能够匹配或超过参考传统高升力配置(即配备机舱机的CRM-HL)的升力性能,从而满足NASA先进航空运输技术(AATT)项目目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信