HOW TO WRITE A GOOD QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS?

N. Çınar, Seda Tecik
{"title":"HOW TO WRITE A GOOD QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS?","authors":"N. Çınar, Seda Tecik","doi":"10.54803/sauhsd.1086071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good qualitative review is an invaluable resource, synthesizing and presenting all available evidence for the interested phenomenon and research question. Systematic reviews are considered the gold standard due to author bias is lower together with a comprehensive literature review. In recent years, with the increasing awareness of the power of qualitative research to influence policy and practice, the need for qualitative evidence syntheses, also known as systematic reviews of qualitative research, has begun to be felt more. Although qualitative evidence syntheses are strong in terms of evidence, they increase the risk of bias when the research method is not properly designed and reported. Qualitative evidence syntheses differ methodologically from traditional systematic reviews. In this article, information about writing a good qualitative evidence synthesis is shared in line with the literature.","PeriodicalId":375851,"journal":{"name":"Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54803/sauhsd.1086071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A good qualitative review is an invaluable resource, synthesizing and presenting all available evidence for the interested phenomenon and research question. Systematic reviews are considered the gold standard due to author bias is lower together with a comprehensive literature review. In recent years, with the increasing awareness of the power of qualitative research to influence policy and practice, the need for qualitative evidence syntheses, also known as systematic reviews of qualitative research, has begun to be felt more. Although qualitative evidence syntheses are strong in terms of evidence, they increase the risk of bias when the research method is not properly designed and reported. Qualitative evidence syntheses differ methodologically from traditional systematic reviews. In this article, information about writing a good qualitative evidence synthesis is shared in line with the literature.
如何写好定性证据综合?
一篇好的定性综述是一种宝贵的资源,它综合并呈现了感兴趣的现象和研究问题的所有可用证据。系统评价被认为是金标准,因为作者偏倚与综合文献评价一起较低。近年来,随着人们越来越认识到定性研究对政策和实践的影响,人们开始更多地感受到对定性证据综合的需求,也就是对定性研究的系统评价。虽然定性证据综合在证据方面是强有力的,但当研究方法设计和报告不当时,它们会增加偏倚的风险。定性证据综合在方法上不同于传统的系统评价。在本文中,关于撰写一个好的定性证据合成的信息是与文献一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信