THE FAMILY BUSINESS

Wayne Broehl
{"title":"THE FAMILY BUSINESS","authors":"Wayne Broehl","doi":"10.1142/9789811238376_0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My assignment tonight, one filled so admirably by Mira Wilkins last year, is a nostalgic one, for it calls for the speaker to be autobiographical-to look backward in one's career over the whole body of research and writing efforts. This generally is a revealing experience, and it was for me, for I realized how centrally my own efforts in the field of business history have been concentrated on family firms. There are a number of famous family names in American business history-the Rockefellers, Fords, Du Ponts, Vanderbilts, Watsohs-yes, even the Binghams and the Quayles. In most cases these have been family businesses in the sense that both ownership and management passed from one generation to the next. Yet it is startling to realize how few major American companies which started this way have been able to carry the family management thread much beyond the second generation, let alone the third. The Du Ponts have done so, counting in-laws; Henry Ford II was, of course, the third generation, but that seemed to be the last of the Fords in top management, although a recent set of articles in the press have suggested that the string, although broken, might be mended. Yet the family business has been an enduring American institution and has lessons to relate, both positive and negative. For a moment, let me use my own work as examples of the family business in the United States. It is a small set but has the advantage of being one of quite varied businesses. Perhaps most important, in most of them I had the special opportunity of being on the scene studying them just at the point of transition from one generation to the next. I will put particular focus on the issue of transition in my remarks tonight. My first book, also my doctoral dissertation, was a business history of Norwalk Truck Line company, at the time (1954) one of the half dozen large interstate motor carriers. While it was a corporation, it really was the child of one person, the sole owner. A wonderful old man of German extraction, John Ernsthausen, had started the company in 1920 as a produce wholesaler, driving his own truck from the country into Cleveland, Ohio. By sheer persistence and hard work over 35 years he had built it into a major business. Ernsthausen was unsophisticated and had only a primitive view of the management process, but he gave me an acute sense of how important one individual can be in an organization. He had a naivete about business life that was at once both charming and frightening. For example, he made the","PeriodicalId":143278,"journal":{"name":"Strategy for the Wealthy Family","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy for the Wealthy Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811238376_0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My assignment tonight, one filled so admirably by Mira Wilkins last year, is a nostalgic one, for it calls for the speaker to be autobiographical-to look backward in one's career over the whole body of research and writing efforts. This generally is a revealing experience, and it was for me, for I realized how centrally my own efforts in the field of business history have been concentrated on family firms. There are a number of famous family names in American business history-the Rockefellers, Fords, Du Ponts, Vanderbilts, Watsohs-yes, even the Binghams and the Quayles. In most cases these have been family businesses in the sense that both ownership and management passed from one generation to the next. Yet it is startling to realize how few major American companies which started this way have been able to carry the family management thread much beyond the second generation, let alone the third. The Du Ponts have done so, counting in-laws; Henry Ford II was, of course, the third generation, but that seemed to be the last of the Fords in top management, although a recent set of articles in the press have suggested that the string, although broken, might be mended. Yet the family business has been an enduring American institution and has lessons to relate, both positive and negative. For a moment, let me use my own work as examples of the family business in the United States. It is a small set but has the advantage of being one of quite varied businesses. Perhaps most important, in most of them I had the special opportunity of being on the scene studying them just at the point of transition from one generation to the next. I will put particular focus on the issue of transition in my remarks tonight. My first book, also my doctoral dissertation, was a business history of Norwalk Truck Line company, at the time (1954) one of the half dozen large interstate motor carriers. While it was a corporation, it really was the child of one person, the sole owner. A wonderful old man of German extraction, John Ernsthausen, had started the company in 1920 as a produce wholesaler, driving his own truck from the country into Cleveland, Ohio. By sheer persistence and hard work over 35 years he had built it into a major business. Ernsthausen was unsophisticated and had only a primitive view of the management process, but he gave me an acute sense of how important one individual can be in an organization. He had a naivete about business life that was at once both charming and frightening. For example, he made the
家族企业
我今晚的任务是一个怀旧的任务,去年米拉·威尔金斯(Mira Wilkins)出色地完成了这个任务,因为它要求演讲者具有自传性——回顾自己的整个研究和写作生涯。总的来说,这是一次发人深省的经历,对我来说也是如此,因为我意识到自己在商业史领域的努力是多么集中在家族企业上。美国商业历史上有许多著名的家族——洛克菲勒家族、福特家族、杜邦家族、范德比尔特家族、沃特森家族——是的,甚至还有宾厄姆家族和奎尔家族。在大多数情况下,这些企业都是家族企业,从某种意义上说,所有权和管理权都是代代相传的。然而,令人吃惊的是,很少有以这种方式起家的美国大公司能够将家族管理的主线延续到第二代之后,更不用说第三代了。杜庞特一家已经这么做了,算上姻亲;亨利·福特二世,当然,是第三代,但似乎是最后一个福特的高层管理人员,尽管最近在媒体上的一系列文章表明,弦,虽然断了,可能会修补。然而,家族企业一直是一种经久不衰的美国制度,有很多值得借鉴的教训,既有积极的,也有消极的。暂时,让我用我自己的工作作为美国家族企业的例子。这是一个小的集合,但有一个优势,是相当多样化的业务之一。也许最重要的是,在他们中的大多数,我有特别的机会在他们从一代过渡到下一代的时候,在现场研究他们。在今晚的讲话中,我将特别关注过渡问题。我的第一本书,也是我的博士论文,是关于诺沃克卡车公司的商业历史,当时(1954年)是六家大型州际汽车运输公司之一。虽然它是一个公司,但它实际上是一个人的孩子,唯一的所有者。1920年,一位了不起的德国裔老人约翰·恩斯特豪森开着自己的卡车从乡下来到俄亥俄州的克利夫兰,创办了这家农产品批发商的公司。凭借35年的坚持不懈和辛勤工作,他把它打造成了一门大生意。恩斯特豪森并不老练,对管理过程的看法也很原始,但他让我敏锐地意识到,一个人在一个组织中可以发挥多么重要的作用。他对商业生活有一种既迷人又可怕的天真。例如,他制作了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信