Wittgenstein’s Philosophy and Austrian Economics

Richard Mcdonough
{"title":"Wittgenstein’s Philosophy and Austrian Economics","authors":"Richard Mcdonough","doi":"10.3968/5884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper, following a suggestion by Kripke, argues that there is an illuminating analogy between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and Austrian economics (particularly that of Mises and Hayek).  Most scholars interpret paragraph 608 of Wittgenstein’s Zettel (hereafter Z608) to suggest that language might arise out of physical chaos at the neural centre.  Since, however, Wittgenstein holds that the philosopher must not advance theories, he cannot consistently be advancing such theories in Z608.  Rather, all the key concepts in Z608 must be cashed in terms of Wittgenstein’s “forms of life”.  Thus, Z608, read carefully, suggests that language “arises”, not out of chaos in the brain, but out of the chaotic activities in human forms of life.  The paper shows that an analogous picture occurs in the early Austrian economists (such as Hayek, who is Wittgenstein’s cousin, and Mises). Z608 is part of a still unappreciated Austrian movement that emphasizes the creative chaos in human life.  In this connection the paper explains how Z608 is an application of Wittgenstein’s “private language argument” against a neural theory of a private language. Finally, the paper shows that the real argument in Z608 traces to early Austrian phenomenology—shedding light both on Wittgenstein’s philosophy and on Austrian economics.","PeriodicalId":429857,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Sociology of Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Sociology of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3968/5884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper, following a suggestion by Kripke, argues that there is an illuminating analogy between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and Austrian economics (particularly that of Mises and Hayek).  Most scholars interpret paragraph 608 of Wittgenstein’s Zettel (hereafter Z608) to suggest that language might arise out of physical chaos at the neural centre.  Since, however, Wittgenstein holds that the philosopher must not advance theories, he cannot consistently be advancing such theories in Z608.  Rather, all the key concepts in Z608 must be cashed in terms of Wittgenstein’s “forms of life”.  Thus, Z608, read carefully, suggests that language “arises”, not out of chaos in the brain, but out of the chaotic activities in human forms of life.  The paper shows that an analogous picture occurs in the early Austrian economists (such as Hayek, who is Wittgenstein’s cousin, and Mises). Z608 is part of a still unappreciated Austrian movement that emphasizes the creative chaos in human life.  In this connection the paper explains how Z608 is an application of Wittgenstein’s “private language argument” against a neural theory of a private language. Finally, the paper shows that the real argument in Z608 traces to early Austrian phenomenology—shedding light both on Wittgenstein’s philosophy and on Austrian economics.
维特根斯坦哲学与奥地利经济学
根据克里普克的建议,这篇论文认为维特根斯坦的哲学与奥地利经济学(尤其是米塞斯和哈耶克的哲学)之间有着启发性的相似之处。大多数学者将维特根斯坦的《泽特尔论》(Z608)的第608段解释为语言可能产生于神经中枢的物理混乱。然而,由于维特根斯坦认为哲学家不应该推进理论,他不可能在Z608中始终如一地推进这些理论。相反,Z608中的所有关键概念都必须用维特根斯坦的“生命形式”来兑现。因此,仔细阅读Z608表明,语言“产生”,不是从大脑的混乱,而是从人类生命形式的混乱活动中产生的。这篇论文表明,早期奥地利经济学家(如维特根斯坦的表亲哈耶克和米塞斯)也出现了类似的情况。Z608是奥地利运动的一部分,该运动强调人类生活中的创造性混乱。在此基础上,本文解释了Z608是如何运用维特根斯坦的“私人语言论证”来反对私人语言的神经理论。最后,本文表明Z608的真正争论可以追溯到早期奥地利现象学,这对维特根斯坦的哲学和奥地利经济学都有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信