Enhancing comment Feedback classification using text classifiers with word centrality measures

Watchreewan Jitsakul, P. Meesad, S. Sodsee
{"title":"Enhancing comment Feedback classification using text classifiers with word centrality measures","authors":"Watchreewan Jitsakul, P. Meesad, S. Sodsee","doi":"10.1109/INCIT.2017.8257879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a novelty of item's feedback classification in e-commerce systems. This proposed work is developed based on a combination between a text classifier and word centrality measures. Herein, the item's feedback means comments written by customers to the purchased items, which are classified into positive or negative comments. In this work, the suitable text classifier is selected from four major types of classification: Rule-based, Tree structure-based, Probability-based, and Learning-based, which are Conjunctive Rule, Random Forest, Bayesian Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine, respectively. In this work, the classifiers are used for identifying the feedbacks in the probability distribution value [0, 1]. On the other hand, items' feedbacks are also represented by a graph, which is presenting a relationship among words. As well as, centrality measures are applied to determine each contained word centrality, and finalize to a probability centrality in [0, 1]. Both probability distribution and probability centrality, here, are applied to classify the item's feedback to positive or negative comments. The simulation results showed that the proposed classification method was efficient to classify three benchmark datasets, compared to other existing approaches with an average of classification accuracy 80.9%.","PeriodicalId":405827,"journal":{"name":"2017 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCIT.2017.8257879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper presents a novelty of item's feedback classification in e-commerce systems. This proposed work is developed based on a combination between a text classifier and word centrality measures. Herein, the item's feedback means comments written by customers to the purchased items, which are classified into positive or negative comments. In this work, the suitable text classifier is selected from four major types of classification: Rule-based, Tree structure-based, Probability-based, and Learning-based, which are Conjunctive Rule, Random Forest, Bayesian Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine, respectively. In this work, the classifiers are used for identifying the feedbacks in the probability distribution value [0, 1]. On the other hand, items' feedbacks are also represented by a graph, which is presenting a relationship among words. As well as, centrality measures are applied to determine each contained word centrality, and finalize to a probability centrality in [0, 1]. Both probability distribution and probability centrality, here, are applied to classify the item's feedback to positive or negative comments. The simulation results showed that the proposed classification method was efficient to classify three benchmark datasets, compared to other existing approaches with an average of classification accuracy 80.9%.
使用具有词中心性度量的文本分类器增强评论反馈分类
提出了电子商务系统中物品反馈分类的新方法。这项提议的工作是基于文本分类器和词中心性度量之间的组合而开发的。在这里,商品的反馈是指顾客对所购商品所写的评论,分为正面评论和负面评论。本文从基于规则、基于树结构、基于概率和基于学习的四种主要分类类型中选择合适的文本分类器,这四种分类类型分别是合取规则、随机森林、贝叶斯逻辑回归和支持向量机。在本工作中,分类器用于识别概率分布值[0,1]中的反馈。另一方面,项目的反馈也用一个图来表示,这是单词之间的关系。此外,我们还应用中心性度量来确定每个包含的词的中心性,并最终得到[0,1]中的一个概率中心性。在这里,概率分布和概率中心性都被用于对项目的正面或负面评论反馈进行分类。仿真结果表明,所提出的分类方法对三个基准数据集进行了有效的分类,与其他现有方法相比,平均分类准确率为80.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信