The Debate on the Grace Period in Appealing Cases Against the State Administrative Court

Lamira Sekar Monica, J. Laan
{"title":"The Debate on the Grace Period in Appealing Cases Against the State Administrative Court","authors":"Lamira Sekar Monica, J. Laan","doi":"10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The grace period of 90 days for cassation to the competent Administrative Court is very important. After the grace period ends, the TUN decision may not intervene even if it is in a state of serious damage. Article 55 of the Law on State Administrative Courts clearly stipulates the basic principles regarding the time limit for submitting a case application to the Administrative Court. The KTUN applies several variables to show that it provides the greatest opportunity for anyone to take legal action if the issued KTUN violates the laws and regulations and AAPB principles. But on the other hand, the limitation of the time limit for litigation in the Administrative Court which is contrary to the sense of justice can be considered as a limitation of human rights to protect their legitimate interests in court.","PeriodicalId":156893,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The grace period of 90 days for cassation to the competent Administrative Court is very important. After the grace period ends, the TUN decision may not intervene even if it is in a state of serious damage. Article 55 of the Law on State Administrative Courts clearly stipulates the basic principles regarding the time limit for submitting a case application to the Administrative Court. The KTUN applies several variables to show that it provides the greatest opportunity for anyone to take legal action if the issued KTUN violates the laws and regulations and AAPB principles. But on the other hand, the limitation of the time limit for litigation in the Administrative Court which is contrary to the sense of justice can be considered as a limitation of human rights to protect their legitimate interests in court.
国家行政法院上诉案件宽限期之争
向主管行政法院提出上诉的90天宽限期是非常重要的。宽限期结束后,即使处于严重损害状态,TUN决定也不能介入。《国家行政法院法》第五十五条明确规定了向行政法院提出案件申请的时限的基本原则。如果发布的KTUN违反法律法规和AAPB原则,KTUN将使用几个变量来表明它为任何人提供了采取法律行动的最大机会。但另一方面,行政法院对诉讼时限的限制违背了正义感,可以认为是对人权的一种限制,是为了保护人权在法院的合法权益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信