Does Recognition of Emotions Differ in People with and without Chronic Pain when a Lower Face Covering is Used? A Cross Sectional Study

H. Piekartz, Alisa Gehrcke, Susan Armijo-Olivo
{"title":"Does Recognition of Emotions Differ in People with and without Chronic Pain when a Lower Face Covering is Used? A Cross Sectional Study","authors":"H. Piekartz, Alisa Gehrcke, Susan Armijo-Olivo","doi":"10.31038/psyj.2023513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As a result of the Covid panidemic, face masks are routinely used around the world. These could hamper the recognition of (basic) emotions and lead to misunderstandings. People with chronic pain typically struggle with (non-) verbal communication, and their behavior is frequently interpreted differently by their surroundings. This paper examines the variance in emotion recognition (accuracy and speed) between individuals with chronic pain and asymptomatic subjects. Methods: Four validated measures (Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)) were used to differentiate between the asymptomatic control (CP) and chronic pain group (PG). In addition, a computerized emotion recognition test (ERT) comprised of 42 morphed images depicting six fundamental emotions (with) out lower fase covering was utilized to measure the accuracy and time required for this study. Results: The recruitment and analysis of 170 patients included 98 subjects with chronic pain (PG). There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between CP and PG (with) out lower face covering in the recognition of all basic emotions. In both groups, fear (from 57.1% to 66.3%) and disgust (from 67.1% to 69.1%) were more prevalent in the PG. Sadness and disgust (p<0.0001) in the PG were especially harder to identify when the lower face was concealed. There was no statistically significant difference in time between CG and PG without facial covering (p=0.34, p=0.4). Conclusion: People in a chronic pain state have more difficulty with emotion recognition without lower face covering, but there is no difference in time. Emotion recognition, especially sadness and disgust with face covering are significantly diminished in PG were disgust was frequently confused with anger and fear with astonishment.","PeriodicalId":352931,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Journal: Research Open","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Journal: Research Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/psyj.2023513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a result of the Covid panidemic, face masks are routinely used around the world. These could hamper the recognition of (basic) emotions and lead to misunderstandings. People with chronic pain typically struggle with (non-) verbal communication, and their behavior is frequently interpreted differently by their surroundings. This paper examines the variance in emotion recognition (accuracy and speed) between individuals with chronic pain and asymptomatic subjects. Methods: Four validated measures (Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)) were used to differentiate between the asymptomatic control (CP) and chronic pain group (PG). In addition, a computerized emotion recognition test (ERT) comprised of 42 morphed images depicting six fundamental emotions (with) out lower fase covering was utilized to measure the accuracy and time required for this study. Results: The recruitment and analysis of 170 patients included 98 subjects with chronic pain (PG). There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between CP and PG (with) out lower face covering in the recognition of all basic emotions. In both groups, fear (from 57.1% to 66.3%) and disgust (from 67.1% to 69.1%) were more prevalent in the PG. Sadness and disgust (p<0.0001) in the PG were especially harder to identify when the lower face was concealed. There was no statistically significant difference in time between CG and PG without facial covering (p=0.34, p=0.4). Conclusion: People in a chronic pain state have more difficulty with emotion recognition without lower face covering, but there is no difference in time. Emotion recognition, especially sadness and disgust with face covering are significantly diminished in PG were disgust was frequently confused with anger and fear with astonishment.
当使用下面罩时,有慢性疼痛和没有慢性疼痛的人对情绪的识别是否不同?横断面研究
背景:由于新冠肺炎大流行,世界各地都在常规使用口罩。这可能会妨碍对(基本)情绪的识别,并导致误解。患有慢性疼痛的人通常与(非)语言交流作斗争,他们的行为经常被周围环境不同地解释。本文研究了慢性疼痛个体和无症状受试者在情绪识别(准确性和速度)方面的差异。方法:采用中央致敏性量表(CSI)、慢性疼痛分级量表(GCPS)、简短疼痛量表(BPI)和多伦多述情量表(TAS-20)四种有效的测量方法来区分无症状对照组(CP)和慢性疼痛组(PG)。此外,计算机化的情绪识别测试(ERT)由42张描绘6种基本情绪的变形图像组成,用于测量本研究所需的准确性和时间。结果:170例慢性疼痛(PG)患者中98例纳入分析。CP组与PG组在所有基本情绪的识别上差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。在两组中,恐惧(从57.1%到66.3%)和厌恶(从67.1%到69.1%)在PG中更为普遍。当下脸被隐藏时,PG中的悲伤和厌恶(p<0.0001)尤其难以识别。无面部覆盖物组与无面部覆盖物组的时间差异无统计学意义(p=0.34, p=0.4)。结论:慢性疼痛状态下未蒙下面部者情绪识别困难,但时间上无差异。PG组的情绪识别能力明显下降,尤其是悲伤和蒙脸时的厌恶,他们经常将厌恶与愤怒混淆,将恐惧与惊讶混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信