Freud ve Lacan’ın Psikanalitik Kuramlarında Yastan Ayrışan Melankolik Özne

Aylin Özkan, Sinem Baltacı
{"title":"Freud ve Lacan’ın Psikanalitik Kuramlarında Yastan Ayrışan Melankolik Özne","authors":"Aylin Özkan, Sinem Baltacı","doi":"10.26650/sp2019-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mourning is one of the two concepts that emerged from Freud's article Mourning and Melancholia and is frequently subjected to research. However the concept of melancholia is studied less. Furthermore, melancholia remains in an ambiguous position: sometimes it is attributed to a person's personality pattern and sometimes to a depressive mood or even sometimes to a psychotic structure. From this point of view, in this article, the work of Freud and Lacan (who recontextualized Freud’s literature), on mourning and melancholia are examined comparatively. Accordingly, Freud expressed that mourning and melancholia are similar in the loss of a loved object and while mourning is an ordinary response to loss melancholia is an extraordinary position. Faced with Freud's view that mourning and melancholia are similar in terms of lost object, but differ in terms of their functioning, Lacan reconsidered these two concepts through the topological structure of Symbolic, Imaginary and Real. In Lacan's conceptualization, mourning as a process connects the subject to the symbolic order through rituals or ceremonies. The subject who does not/cannot pass beyond this process is stuck in jouissance staying alone with Real in melancholia. In this recent article, several clinical practice and research examples are included following the theoretical examination. Based on this, it is thought that in a state of melancholia, the person is in pain while maintaining a position that one takes as a move from castration to escape and that the way out of this pain is only possible with a symbolic study. However, it is important to study the appearance of melancholia in different subject formations together with today's changing cultural background. As a result, it is thought that how melancholia is expressed in language and its relationship with the defense mechanism related to subject formation of the individual determines the central point in an analytical study.","PeriodicalId":224243,"journal":{"name":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/sp2019-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mourning is one of the two concepts that emerged from Freud's article Mourning and Melancholia and is frequently subjected to research. However the concept of melancholia is studied less. Furthermore, melancholia remains in an ambiguous position: sometimes it is attributed to a person's personality pattern and sometimes to a depressive mood or even sometimes to a psychotic structure. From this point of view, in this article, the work of Freud and Lacan (who recontextualized Freud’s literature), on mourning and melancholia are examined comparatively. Accordingly, Freud expressed that mourning and melancholia are similar in the loss of a loved object and while mourning is an ordinary response to loss melancholia is an extraordinary position. Faced with Freud's view that mourning and melancholia are similar in terms of lost object, but differ in terms of their functioning, Lacan reconsidered these two concepts through the topological structure of Symbolic, Imaginary and Real. In Lacan's conceptualization, mourning as a process connects the subject to the symbolic order through rituals or ceremonies. The subject who does not/cannot pass beyond this process is stuck in jouissance staying alone with Real in melancholia. In this recent article, several clinical practice and research examples are included following the theoretical examination. Based on this, it is thought that in a state of melancholia, the person is in pain while maintaining a position that one takes as a move from castration to escape and that the way out of this pain is only possible with a symbolic study. However, it is important to study the appearance of melancholia in different subject formations together with today's changing cultural background. As a result, it is thought that how melancholia is expressed in language and its relationship with the defense mechanism related to subject formation of the individual determines the central point in an analytical study.
哀悼是弗洛伊德的文章《哀悼与忧郁》中出现的两个概念之一,经常受到研究。然而,忧郁症的概念研究较少。此外,忧郁症仍然处于一个模棱两可的位置:有时归因于一个人的人格模式,有时归因于抑郁情绪,甚至有时归因于精神结构。从这个角度出发,本文对弗洛伊德和拉康(将弗洛伊德的文学重新语境化)在哀悼和忧郁方面的工作进行了比较研究。因此,弗洛伊德表示,哀悼和忧郁症在失去所爱的对象时是相似的,虽然哀悼是对失去的一种普通反应,但忧郁症是一种不同寻常的状态。面对弗洛伊德关于哀悼与忧郁在失去的客体上相似,但在功能上不同的观点,拉康通过象征、想象和现实的拓扑结构重新思考了这两个概念。在拉康的概念化中,哀悼作为一个过程,通过仪式或仪式将主体与象征秩序联系起来。没有/不能超越这个过程的主体被困在欢爽中,在忧郁中与真实独处。在这篇最近的文章中,几个临床实践和研究的例子包括在理论检验之后。在此基础上,人们认为,在忧郁状态下,人在痛苦中保持着一种从阉割到逃避的姿势,只有通过象征性的研究才能摆脱这种痛苦。然而,结合当今不断变化的文化背景,研究不同主体形态下忧郁症的出现是很重要的。因此,忧郁症如何在语言中表达及其与个体主体形成相关的防御机制的关系,被认为是分析研究的中心点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信