Peanut allergy prevention: Current evidence and implications for clinical practice

L. Allen
{"title":"Peanut allergy prevention: Current evidence and implications for clinical practice","authors":"L. Allen","doi":"10.15273/DMJ.VOL44NO1.7507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade there has been a major shift in clinical practice guidelines from the avoidance of allergenic foods for the purpose of preventing allergy development toward their early introduction before six months of age. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence for this change in recommendation and to evaluate its impli- cations for clinical practice. A literature review and analysis were conducted focusing on key clinical studies that influenced this change in practice over the past decade. The main findings supported the early introduction of peanut to the diet and highlighted two areas of uncertainty in the literature that have implications for adopting the new guidelines in clinical practice. First, current evidence lacks a clear definition of “high risk” for determining allergic predisposition in infants; and second, defining the ideal timing, amount, and frequency with which peanut and peanut containing foods are introduced into a child’s diet is not yet established in the literature. The principal conclusion underscored the importance of early and continual exposure to peanut regardless of risk of atopy.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/DMJ.VOL44NO1.7507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last decade there has been a major shift in clinical practice guidelines from the avoidance of allergenic foods for the purpose of preventing allergy development toward their early introduction before six months of age. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence for this change in recommendation and to evaluate its impli- cations for clinical practice. A literature review and analysis were conducted focusing on key clinical studies that influenced this change in practice over the past decade. The main findings supported the early introduction of peanut to the diet and highlighted two areas of uncertainty in the literature that have implications for adopting the new guidelines in clinical practice. First, current evidence lacks a clear definition of “high risk” for determining allergic predisposition in infants; and second, defining the ideal timing, amount, and frequency with which peanut and peanut containing foods are introduced into a child’s diet is not yet established in the literature. The principal conclusion underscored the importance of early and continual exposure to peanut regardless of risk of atopy.
花生过敏预防:目前的证据和对临床实践的影响
在过去十年中,临床实践指南发生了重大转变从避免过敏性食物以防止过敏发展到6个月前的早期引入。这篇文章的目的是回顾这一建议改变的现有证据,并评估其对临床实践的影响。我们对过去十年中影响这一变化的关键临床研究进行了文献回顾和分析。主要研究结果支持在饮食中早期引入花生,并强调了文献中两个不确定的领域,这对在临床实践中采用新的指导方针有影响。首先,目前的证据缺乏确定婴儿过敏易感性的“高风险”的明确定义;其次,定义花生和含花生食物引入儿童饮食的理想时间,数量和频率在文献中尚未建立。主要结论强调了早期和持续接触花生的重要性,而不考虑过敏性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信