Offshore and the Political and Legal Geography of Finance: 1066-2020 AD

Daniel Haberly
{"title":"Offshore and the Political and Legal Geography of Finance: 1066-2020 AD","authors":"Daniel Haberly","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3741902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic geographers have long defined themselves in opposition to the abstract theoretical universe of economics, rather emphasizing the specificity of economic activities in the “real world.” To a large extent, this emphasis also characterizes the subfield of financial geography, which has tended to focus on the human and material apparatus of financial centers. This focus has allowed the field to provide key insights into the organization and operation of the world economy that have been overlooked by researchers in other fields. However, it also often led to less emphasis being paid to the abstract vehicles and constructs that constitute finance itself—as opposed to the financial system. <br><br>Crucially, the fact that these abstract constructs and vehicles do not inhabit the physical world, does not mean that they do not have a geography. Rather, their geographic footprint defines what is broadly referred to as the “offshore” financial system. A quick review of almost any international economics statistics underscores the rather alarming centrality of this system to the organization of the world economy—with roughly two thirds of the world’s stock of FDI, for example, either in or from shell company jurisdictions where it is unlikely to have a local attachment to substantive activity . However, notwithstanding a significant body of work in economic geography (e.g. Cobb 1998; Haberly and Wojcik 2015; Roberts 1994; Toepfer and Hall 2018; Hudson 2000; Wainwright 2011; Warf 2000), the offshore system continues to be mostly treated as a footnote in analyses of the world economy.<br><br>As will be demonstrated in this chapter, attempting to construct a model of the “real” economy or financial system that simply ignores or strips away the “fictions” of the offshore system is somewhat analogous to stripping away the operating system of a computer in order to try to get a clearer view of the hardware. In other words, rather than being regarded some veil of illusions that obscures our view of the economy, the offshore system needs to be regarded as an integral and critical component of its operational fabric (Coe et. al 2014; Maurer 2008; Palan et al. 2010; Seabrooke and Wigan 2014). Furthermore, far from being some novel feature of the modern world, offshore has deep historical roots. Specially, as will be shown, the unbundling of the state as an institution into what can be described as onshore and offshore spheres has been, since the middle ages in Europe, a persistent outcome of fundamental political tensions that surround the role of the state in capitalism. Indeed, capitalism was in many respects born offshore, and offshore is where capital, to a large extent, continues to live.","PeriodicalId":448175,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic geographers have long defined themselves in opposition to the abstract theoretical universe of economics, rather emphasizing the specificity of economic activities in the “real world.” To a large extent, this emphasis also characterizes the subfield of financial geography, which has tended to focus on the human and material apparatus of financial centers. This focus has allowed the field to provide key insights into the organization and operation of the world economy that have been overlooked by researchers in other fields. However, it also often led to less emphasis being paid to the abstract vehicles and constructs that constitute finance itself—as opposed to the financial system.

Crucially, the fact that these abstract constructs and vehicles do not inhabit the physical world, does not mean that they do not have a geography. Rather, their geographic footprint defines what is broadly referred to as the “offshore” financial system. A quick review of almost any international economics statistics underscores the rather alarming centrality of this system to the organization of the world economy—with roughly two thirds of the world’s stock of FDI, for example, either in or from shell company jurisdictions where it is unlikely to have a local attachment to substantive activity . However, notwithstanding a significant body of work in economic geography (e.g. Cobb 1998; Haberly and Wojcik 2015; Roberts 1994; Toepfer and Hall 2018; Hudson 2000; Wainwright 2011; Warf 2000), the offshore system continues to be mostly treated as a footnote in analyses of the world economy.

As will be demonstrated in this chapter, attempting to construct a model of the “real” economy or financial system that simply ignores or strips away the “fictions” of the offshore system is somewhat analogous to stripping away the operating system of a computer in order to try to get a clearer view of the hardware. In other words, rather than being regarded some veil of illusions that obscures our view of the economy, the offshore system needs to be regarded as an integral and critical component of its operational fabric (Coe et. al 2014; Maurer 2008; Palan et al. 2010; Seabrooke and Wigan 2014). Furthermore, far from being some novel feature of the modern world, offshore has deep historical roots. Specially, as will be shown, the unbundling of the state as an institution into what can be described as onshore and offshore spheres has been, since the middle ages in Europe, a persistent outcome of fundamental political tensions that surround the role of the state in capitalism. Indeed, capitalism was in many respects born offshore, and offshore is where capital, to a large extent, continues to live.
离岸与金融的政治和法律地理:公元1066-2020年
长期以来,经济地理学家一直把自己定义为反对抽象的经济学理论领域,而是强调“现实世界”中经济活动的特殊性。在很大程度上,这种强调也是金融地理学子领域的特征,它倾向于关注金融中心的人力和物力设备。这种关注使该领域能够对世界经济的组织和运行提供重要的见解,而这些见解被其他领域的研究人员所忽视。然而,它也经常导致人们不太重视构成金融本身的抽象工具和结构,而不是金融体系。至关重要的是,这些抽象的结构和交通工具并不存在于物理世界,这并不意味着它们没有地理位置。相反,它们的地理足迹定义了所谓的“离岸”金融体系。对几乎所有国际经济统计数据的快速回顾都强调了这一体系在世界经济组织中相当令人担忧的中心地位——例如,世界上大约三分之二的外国直接投资存量要么在空壳公司辖区内,要么来自空壳公司辖区,在这些辖区内,外国直接投资不太可能与实质性活动有地方联系。然而,尽管在经济地理学方面有大量的工作(例如Cobb 1998;Haberly and Wojcik 2015;罗伯特1994;Toepfer and Hall 2018;哈德逊2000;温赖特2011;自2000年以来,离岸系统仍然主要被视为世界经济分析中的一个脚注。正如本章将展示的那样,试图构建一个“真实”经济或金融系统的模型,简单地忽略或剥离离岸系统的“虚构”,有点类似于剥离计算机的操作系统,以试图获得更清晰的硬件视图。换句话说,海上系统不应被视为掩盖我们对经济观点的假象,而应被视为其运营结构中不可或缺的关键组成部分(Coe et. al 2014;毛雷尔2008;Palan et al. 2010;seabroke and Wigan 2014)。此外,离岸远非现代世界的新特征,而是有着深厚的历史根源。特别是,正如我们将会看到的,自欧洲中世纪以来,国家作为一种制度被划分为陆上和海上领域,这是围绕着国家在资本主义中的角色的基本政治紧张局势的持续结果。事实上,资本主义在许多方面都是在海外诞生的,而在很大程度上,海外也是资本继续生存的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信