CQA-WF: Consistent Query Answers to Conjunctive Queries Using the Well-Founded Semantics

Julia Belmar, J. Cuevas, Mónica Caniupán Marileo
{"title":"CQA-WF: Consistent Query Answers to Conjunctive Queries Using the Well-Founded Semantics","authors":"Julia Belmar, J. Cuevas, Mónica Caniupán Marileo","doi":"10.1109/SCCC.2011.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A database instance can become inconsistent with respect to its integrity constraints (ICs), for instance, after update operations. When this happens, it is possible to compute the repairs of the database. A minimal repair is a new database instance that satisfies the ICs, is obtained by applying update operations over the original instance, and differs minimally from the original instance. We can evaluate queries over the repairs, an answer to a conjunctive query is consistent if it is an answer in every repair. The repairs of database instances can be specified by repair programs. Moreover, we can compute consistent answers to queries by evaluating query programs together with the repair programs under the stable model semantics. The use of logic programs does not exceed the intrinsic complexity of consistent query answering. Nevertheless, for a certain class of conjunctive queries and ICs it is possible to use the alternative well-founded semantics (WFS) to evaluate queries. We present CQA-WF, a system that allows the computation of consistent answers to conjunctive queries over inconsistent databases with respect to functional dependencies (FDs). CQA-WF evaluates logic programs under the WFS. The WFS has lower data complexity than the stable models semantics.","PeriodicalId":173639,"journal":{"name":"2011 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2011.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A database instance can become inconsistent with respect to its integrity constraints (ICs), for instance, after update operations. When this happens, it is possible to compute the repairs of the database. A minimal repair is a new database instance that satisfies the ICs, is obtained by applying update operations over the original instance, and differs minimally from the original instance. We can evaluate queries over the repairs, an answer to a conjunctive query is consistent if it is an answer in every repair. The repairs of database instances can be specified by repair programs. Moreover, we can compute consistent answers to queries by evaluating query programs together with the repair programs under the stable model semantics. The use of logic programs does not exceed the intrinsic complexity of consistent query answering. Nevertheless, for a certain class of conjunctive queries and ICs it is possible to use the alternative well-founded semantics (WFS) to evaluate queries. We present CQA-WF, a system that allows the computation of consistent answers to conjunctive queries over inconsistent databases with respect to functional dependencies (FDs). CQA-WF evaluates logic programs under the WFS. The WFS has lower data complexity than the stable models semantics.
CQA-WF:使用良好基础语义的连接查询的一致查询答案
例如,在更新操作之后,数据库实例可能与其完整性约束(ic)不一致。发生这种情况时,可以计算数据库的修复。最小修复是一个满足ic的新数据库实例,通过对原始实例应用更新操作获得,并且与原始实例的差异最小。我们可以对修复的查询求值,如果一个连接查询的答案在每个修复中都是一个答案,那么它就是一致的。数据库实例的修复可以由修复程序指定。此外,在稳定模型语义下,我们可以通过评估查询程序和修复程序来计算查询的一致答案。逻辑程序的使用不超过一致性查询应答的内在复杂性。然而,对于某些类别的联合查询和ic,可以使用另一种基于良好基础的语义(WFS)来评估查询。我们提出了CQA-WF,一个系统,允许计算关于功能依赖(fd)的不一致数据库上的联合查询的一致答案。CQA-WF评估WFS下的逻辑程序。WFS具有比稳定模型语义更低的数据复杂度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信