On truth discovery in social sensing: A maximum likelihood estimation approach

Dong Wang, Lance M. Kaplan, H. Le, T. Abdelzaher
{"title":"On truth discovery in social sensing: A maximum likelihood estimation approach","authors":"Dong Wang, Lance M. Kaplan, H. Le, T. Abdelzaher","doi":"10.1145/2185677.2185737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the challenge of truth discovery from noisy social sensing data. The work is motivated by the emergence of social sensing as a data collection paradigm of growing interest, where humans perform sensory data collection tasks. A challenge in social sensing applications lies in the noisy nature of data. Unlike the case with well-calibrated and well-tested infrastructure sensors, humans are less reliable, and the likelihood that participants' measurements are correct is often unknown a priori. Given a set of human participants of unknown reliability together with their sensory measurements, this paper poses the question of whether one can use this information alone to determine, in an analytically founded manner, the probability that a given measurement is true. The paper focuses on binary measurements. While some previous work approached the answer in a heuristic manner, we offer the first optimal solution to the above truth discovery problem. Optimality, in the sense of maximum likelihood estimation, is attained by solving an expectation maximization problem that returns the best guess regarding the correctness of each measurement. The approach is shown to outperform the state of the art fact-finding heuristics, as well as simple baselines such as majority voting.","PeriodicalId":231003,"journal":{"name":"2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"364","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2185677.2185737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 364

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of truth discovery from noisy social sensing data. The work is motivated by the emergence of social sensing as a data collection paradigm of growing interest, where humans perform sensory data collection tasks. A challenge in social sensing applications lies in the noisy nature of data. Unlike the case with well-calibrated and well-tested infrastructure sensors, humans are less reliable, and the likelihood that participants' measurements are correct is often unknown a priori. Given a set of human participants of unknown reliability together with their sensory measurements, this paper poses the question of whether one can use this information alone to determine, in an analytically founded manner, the probability that a given measurement is true. The paper focuses on binary measurements. While some previous work approached the answer in a heuristic manner, we offer the first optimal solution to the above truth discovery problem. Optimality, in the sense of maximum likelihood estimation, is attained by solving an expectation maximization problem that returns the best guess regarding the correctness of each measurement. The approach is shown to outperform the state of the art fact-finding heuristics, as well as simple baselines such as majority voting.
社会感知中的真理发现:一种极大似然估计方法
本文解决了从嘈杂的社会传感数据中发现真相的挑战。这项工作的动机是社会传感作为一种越来越感兴趣的数据收集范式的出现,其中人类执行感官数据收集任务。社会传感应用的一个挑战在于数据的嘈杂性。与经过良好校准和测试的基础设施传感器不同,人类不太可靠,参与者测量正确的可能性通常是先验未知的。给定一组未知可靠性的人类参与者以及他们的感官测量,本文提出了一个问题,即是否可以单独使用这些信息来确定,以一种分析建立的方式,给定测量是真实的概率。本文主要讨论二值测量。虽然之前的一些工作以启发式的方式接近答案,但我们为上述真理发现问题提供了第一个最优解决方案。在最大似然估计的意义上,最优性是通过解决期望最大化问题来实现的,该问题返回关于每个测量的正确性的最佳猜测。该方法被证明优于最先进的事实发现启发式,以及简单的基线,如多数投票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信