Two under-approximation techniques for 3-modal abstraction coverage of event systems: Joint effort?

J. Julliand, O. Kouchnarenko, P. Masson, G. Voiron
{"title":"Two under-approximation techniques for 3-modal abstraction coverage of event systems: Joint effort?","authors":"J. Julliand, O. Kouchnarenko, P. Masson, G. Voiron","doi":"10.1109/TASE.2017.8285632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-based testing of event systems can take advantage of considering abstractions rather than explicit models, for controlling their size. A test is then a connected and reachable event sequence. This paper reports on experiments made when adapting for event systems two known under-approximation techniques of predicate tri-modal (may, must+, must-) abstractions. We first instantiate all the abstract may transitions, preferably as reachable instances. Second, we complete this underapproximation with instantiations of Ball chains, i.e. sequences in the shape of must-∗may.must+∗ transitions, as such sequences are guaranteed to have connected instantiations. We present a backward symbolic instantiation algorithm for connecting these two under-approximations. We experimentally address the question of their complementarity. Surprisingly, our results show that Ball chains have not enhanced the coverage already achieved by the first step of may-transitions instantiation. However, it has enhanced the number of test steps by prolonging the already existing tests.","PeriodicalId":221968,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2017.8285632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Model-based testing of event systems can take advantage of considering abstractions rather than explicit models, for controlling their size. A test is then a connected and reachable event sequence. This paper reports on experiments made when adapting for event systems two known under-approximation techniques of predicate tri-modal (may, must+, must-) abstractions. We first instantiate all the abstract may transitions, preferably as reachable instances. Second, we complete this underapproximation with instantiations of Ball chains, i.e. sequences in the shape of must-∗may.must+∗ transitions, as such sequences are guaranteed to have connected instantiations. We present a backward symbolic instantiation algorithm for connecting these two under-approximations. We experimentally address the question of their complementarity. Surprisingly, our results show that Ball chains have not enhanced the coverage already achieved by the first step of may-transitions instantiation. However, it has enhanced the number of test steps by prolonging the already existing tests.
事件系统三模态抽象覆盖的两种欠近似技术:共同努力?
基于模型的事件系统测试可以利用考虑抽象而不是显式模型的优势来控制它们的大小。测试是一个连接的和可到达的事件序列。本文报道了两种已知的谓词三模态(may, must+, must-)抽象的欠近似技术在适应事件系统时所做的实验。我们首先实例化所有抽象的may转换,最好是可访问的实例。其次,我们用球链的实例来完成这个欠逼近,即must-∗may形状的序列。必须+ *转换,因为这样的序列保证具有连接的实例化。我们提出了一个反向符号实例化算法来连接这两个欠逼近。我们通过实验解决了它们的互补性问题。令人惊讶的是,我们的结果表明,球链并没有增强may-transitions实例化第一步已经实现的覆盖率。但是,它通过延长已经存在的测试,增加了测试步骤的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信