Verification of transaction-level SystemC models using RTL testbenches

R. Jindal, K. Jain
{"title":"Verification of transaction-level SystemC models using RTL testbenches","authors":"R. Jindal, K. Jain","doi":"10.1109/MEMCOD.2003.1210104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System architects working on SoC design have traditionally been hampered by the lack of a coherent methodology for architecture evaluation and co-verification of hardware and software. SystemC 2.0 facilitates the development of transaction-level models (TLMs), which are models of the hardware system components at higher level of abstraction than RTL. Due to lower modeling effort yet higher simulation speed, TLMs are useful for architectural exploration, algorithmic evaluation, hardware-software partitioning and software development. The problems posed by SOC design methodologies require development of models at higher abstraction also for the earlier developed IP's. The development time of a TLM IP is already low, so if we can reduce the verification time by re-use of the earlier RTL test benches we can reduce the overall cost of such an IP TLM. This paper focuses on the methodology to use the RTL testbenches for verification of a SystemC model of the same IP at a higher abstraction level (transaction level), some tools available in the market to support this testbench reuse and the implementation challenges posed by the mentioned verification technique.","PeriodicalId":213762,"journal":{"name":"First ACM and IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design, 2003. MEMOCODE '03. Proceedings.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First ACM and IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design, 2003. MEMOCODE '03. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMCOD.2003.1210104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

System architects working on SoC design have traditionally been hampered by the lack of a coherent methodology for architecture evaluation and co-verification of hardware and software. SystemC 2.0 facilitates the development of transaction-level models (TLMs), which are models of the hardware system components at higher level of abstraction than RTL. Due to lower modeling effort yet higher simulation speed, TLMs are useful for architectural exploration, algorithmic evaluation, hardware-software partitioning and software development. The problems posed by SOC design methodologies require development of models at higher abstraction also for the earlier developed IP's. The development time of a TLM IP is already low, so if we can reduce the verification time by re-use of the earlier RTL test benches we can reduce the overall cost of such an IP TLM. This paper focuses on the methodology to use the RTL testbenches for verification of a SystemC model of the same IP at a higher abstraction level (transaction level), some tools available in the market to support this testbench reuse and the implementation challenges posed by the mentioned verification technique.
使用RTL测试台验证事务级SystemC模型
传统上,从事SoC设计的系统架构师一直受到缺乏架构评估和软硬件协同验证的一致方法的阻碍。SystemC 2.0促进了事务级模型(tlm)的开发,tlm是硬件系统组件在比RTL更高抽象层次上的模型。由于较低的建模工作量和较高的仿真速度,tlm可用于架构探索、算法评估、硬件软件划分和软件开发。SOC设计方法带来的问题要求开发更高抽象的模型,也适用于早期开发的IP。TLM IP的开发时间已经很低了,所以如果我们可以通过重用早期的RTL测试台来减少验证时间,我们就可以降低这种IP TLM的总成本。本文的重点是在更高的抽象级别(事务级别)上使用RTL测试平台来验证相同IP的SystemC模型的方法,市场上一些可用的工具来支持该测试平台的重用,以及上述验证技术带来的实现挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信