State Aid Modernization and Its Implications for the Assessment of Large Investment Projects: The Relevance of Market Screens in the Regional Aid Guidelines

H. Friederiszick, Nicola Tosini
{"title":"State Aid Modernization and Its Implications for the Assessment of Large Investment Projects: The Relevance of Market Screens in the Regional Aid Guidelines","authors":"H. Friederiszick, Nicola Tosini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2163552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Regional Aid Guidelines foresee specific screens for an in-depth assessment of Large Investment Projects (LIPs): an in-depth assessment is initiated if the market share of the aid beneficiary is above 25% or the investment results in a capacity expansion above 5% in a declining market. It is currently being discussed within the broader State Aid Modernization package and also due to a recent court ruling on the case Propapier whether these market screens should stay as they are. Based on a dataset of all LIP cases notified under the 2006 Regional Aid Guidelines, we evaluate those market screens and find that the screens do have power to identify problematic cases – cases with a below average expected aid effectiveness and aid measures targeting specific industries. We also find, however, that the market screens are affected by a severe implementation problem and, hence, do not help to shorten phase I investigations. From a conceptual perspective, they are also not capable of identifying some of the potentially most problematic regional State aid cases. Policy options are discussed.","PeriodicalId":233634,"journal":{"name":"ESMT Berlin Research Paper Series","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMT Berlin Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2163552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Regional Aid Guidelines foresee specific screens for an in-depth assessment of Large Investment Projects (LIPs): an in-depth assessment is initiated if the market share of the aid beneficiary is above 25% or the investment results in a capacity expansion above 5% in a declining market. It is currently being discussed within the broader State Aid Modernization package and also due to a recent court ruling on the case Propapier whether these market screens should stay as they are. Based on a dataset of all LIP cases notified under the 2006 Regional Aid Guidelines, we evaluate those market screens and find that the screens do have power to identify problematic cases – cases with a below average expected aid effectiveness and aid measures targeting specific industries. We also find, however, that the market screens are affected by a severe implementation problem and, hence, do not help to shorten phase I investigations. From a conceptual perspective, they are also not capable of identifying some of the potentially most problematic regional State aid cases. Policy options are discussed.
国家援助现代化及其对大型投资项目评估的影响:区域援助指南中市场筛选的相关性
《区域援助指南》规定了对大型投资项目进行深入评估的具体标准:如果援助受益国的市场份额超过25%,或者在市场下降的情况下,投资导致的产能扩张超过5%,则开始进行深入评估。目前正在更广泛的国家援助现代化一揽子计划中进行讨论,并且由于最近法院对Propapier案件的裁决,这些市场屏幕是否应该保持原样。基于2006年《区域援助指南》下通报的所有LIP案例的数据集,我们评估了这些市场筛选,发现筛选确实有能力识别问题案例——低于平均预期援助有效性的案例和针对特定行业的援助措施。然而,我们还发现,市场筛选受到严重实施问题的影响,因此无助于缩短第一阶段的调查。从概念的角度来看,它们也无法确定一些可能最有问题的区域国家援助案例。讨论了政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书