Understanding Human and Predictive Moderation of Online Science Discourse

Elizabeth Lucas, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, Reynold Bailey
{"title":"Understanding Human and Predictive Moderation of Online Science Discourse","authors":"Elizabeth Lucas, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, Reynold Bailey","doi":"10.1109/WNYIPW.2019.8923109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manual moderation activities can be fatiguing, emotionally exhausting, and potentially traumatizing, yet moderation is essential to the health of the discussion community. Communities, therefore, can benefit from automated moderation systems. We report on a study with a survey about moderation behaviors and an annotation task involving forum comments to aid curating a deeper understanding of moderation towards predictive support. We also create models for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable scientific forum comments and discuss results given moderators responses.","PeriodicalId":275099,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WNYIPW.2019.8923109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Manual moderation activities can be fatiguing, emotionally exhausting, and potentially traumatizing, yet moderation is essential to the health of the discussion community. Communities, therefore, can benefit from automated moderation systems. We report on a study with a survey about moderation behaviors and an annotation task involving forum comments to aid curating a deeper understanding of moderation towards predictive support. We also create models for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable scientific forum comments and discuss results given moderators responses.
理解网络科学话语的人性与预测性节制
手动调节活动可能会使人疲劳,使人情绪疲惫,并可能造成精神创伤,但调节对讨论社区的健康至关重要。因此,社区可以从自动审核系统中受益。我们报告了一项关于审核行为的调查研究和一个涉及论坛评论的注释任务,以帮助更深入地理解对预测支持的审核。我们还创建了模型来区分可接受和不可接受的科学论坛评论,并讨论给出版主回应的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信