{"title":"DEVISING A UNIQUE MODEL FOR SCIENCE OUTREACH PROGRAMMES WITH CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT FROM TEACHERS ACROSS THE 5-19 AGE RANGE","authors":"Victoria Brennan, A. Mallaburn, L. Seton","doi":"10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shanahan et al (2011) argues that science outreach programmes not only aim to support teachers with curriculum engagement and promote scientific literacy, but that they also provide pivotal opportunities to spark scientific interest in students. These notions are widely recognised by the national organisation for science which encourage the partnership between scientists and schools (NSERCC, 2008; NSF, 2008). Outreach work is described as a fun and satisfying venture which can enhance the learning experience (Shanahan et al, 2011); however, Bogue et al (2013) warns that there is little evidence to suggest whether these types of activities achieve their overarching goal; to encourage people to enter and persist within science careers. The aim of this project was to identify how teachers reflect upon science outreach activities they have encountered and reflect on features of these programmes that may contribute to their success. The project was split into two phases: the first phase involved conducting questionnaires (n=52), interviews (n=8) and analysing the data via quantitative tests and thematic analysis (Bran and Clarke, 2006) to develop a preliminary model for the ‘optimum’ delivery of science outreach. The second phase was designed to modify this model using principles of Modified Grounded Theory via conducting focus groups (n=4) to refine the model. The model itself is designed to ensure the experience for the young people who access these outreach programmes is more impactful as it provides longevity to engage students post intervention via the inclusion of parents and teachers. Additionally, the model considers how to support formal learning in school and further enthuse and engage learners in science. There is also a focus upon which aspects of the model are the most important to engage those from a lower socioeconomic background, as this still remains an underrepresented demographic in the physical sciences (Alexander et al 2011; Shaw et al, 2010). Thus, developing inclusive learning cultures is a key aim of this model, with is of interest to those of all educational levels.","PeriodicalId":414865,"journal":{"name":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","volume":"120 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shanahan et al (2011) argues that science outreach programmes not only aim to support teachers with curriculum engagement and promote scientific literacy, but that they also provide pivotal opportunities to spark scientific interest in students. These notions are widely recognised by the national organisation for science which encourage the partnership between scientists and schools (NSERCC, 2008; NSF, 2008). Outreach work is described as a fun and satisfying venture which can enhance the learning experience (Shanahan et al, 2011); however, Bogue et al (2013) warns that there is little evidence to suggest whether these types of activities achieve their overarching goal; to encourage people to enter and persist within science careers. The aim of this project was to identify how teachers reflect upon science outreach activities they have encountered and reflect on features of these programmes that may contribute to their success. The project was split into two phases: the first phase involved conducting questionnaires (n=52), interviews (n=8) and analysing the data via quantitative tests and thematic analysis (Bran and Clarke, 2006) to develop a preliminary model for the ‘optimum’ delivery of science outreach. The second phase was designed to modify this model using principles of Modified Grounded Theory via conducting focus groups (n=4) to refine the model. The model itself is designed to ensure the experience for the young people who access these outreach programmes is more impactful as it provides longevity to engage students post intervention via the inclusion of parents and teachers. Additionally, the model considers how to support formal learning in school and further enthuse and engage learners in science. There is also a focus upon which aspects of the model are the most important to engage those from a lower socioeconomic background, as this still remains an underrepresented demographic in the physical sciences (Alexander et al 2011; Shaw et al, 2010). Thus, developing inclusive learning cultures is a key aim of this model, with is of interest to those of all educational levels.
Shanahan等人(2011)认为,科学推广计划不仅旨在支持教师参与课程并促进科学素养,而且还提供了激发学生科学兴趣的关键机会。这些概念得到了国家科学组织的广泛认可,该组织鼓励科学家和学校之间的伙伴关系(NSERCC, 2008;美国国家科学基金会,2008年)。外展工作被描述为一种有趣和令人满意的冒险,可以增强学习经验(Shanahan et al, 2011);然而,Bogue等人(2013)警告说,几乎没有证据表明这些类型的活动是否实现了其总体目标;鼓励人们进入并坚持科学事业。该项目的目的是确定教师如何反思他们所遇到的科学推广活动,以及反思这些项目可能有助于他们成功的特征。该项目分为两个阶段:第一阶段涉及进行问卷调查(n=52)、访谈(n=8)和通过定量测试和专题分析分析数据(Bran and Clarke, 2006),以开发一个“最佳”科学推广交付的初步模型。第二阶段旨在通过进行焦点小组(n=4)来完善模型,使用修正扎根理论的原则修改该模型。该模式本身旨在确保参与这些外展项目的年轻人的体验更有影响力,因为它通过家长和教师的参与,为干预后的学生提供了长期的参与。此外,该模型考虑了如何支持学校的正式学习,并进一步激发学习者对科学的热情和参与。还有一个重点是模型的哪些方面对于那些来自较低社会经济背景的人来说是最重要的,因为这在物理科学中仍然是一个代表性不足的人口统计(Alexander et al . 2011;Shaw et al ., 2010)。因此,发展包容性学习文化是该模式的一个关键目标,所有教育水平的人都感兴趣。