Hospital-Level Availability of Prone Positioning, 2019 vs 2021

X. Audhya, N. Bosch, J. Stevens, A. Walkey, A. Law
{"title":"Hospital-Level Availability of Prone Positioning, 2019 vs 2021","authors":"X. Audhya, N. Bosch, J. Stevens, A. Walkey, A. Law","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale. Prone positioning (PP) of patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an evidence-based and guideline-recommended practice, but our 2019 survey found that fewer than half of Massachusetts ICUs could routinely offer PP. As studies have described rapid adoption of evidence- and nonevidence- based practices alike during COVID-19, we re-surveyed Massachusetts ICUs in 2021 to determine if institutional-level adoption of PP among intubated patients had changed during the COVID-19 pandemic;we additionally ascertained adoption of awake PP. Methods. In follow-up to our 2019 survey, we surveyed intensive care units (ICUs) at all acute-care hospitals in Massachusetts, June-October 2021. The survey asked: “Does your ICU have the ability to prone intubated patients?” (“Yes, routinely,” “Case-by-case,” or “No”). Follow-up questions inquired if ICUs had protocols/guidelines on intubated PP, trained nurses in intubated PP, and whether awake PP had been adopted. We collected descriptive hospital data (number of ICU and hospital beds, nonprofit status, teaching status, case-mix index) and tested for associations with chi-square tests. Results. Of the 57 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts with ICUs, 47 responded to the survey (82% response;compared to 54/60 [90%] in 2019;three hospitals surveyed in 2019 had closed ICUs in 2021). The number of hospitals able to routinely perform PP in intubated patients increased from 24 (44%) to 39 (83%);hospitals able to perform PP among intubated patients on a case-by-case basis or not at all decreased from 15 (28%) to 5 (11%) and 15 (28%) to 3 (6%), respectively (p<0.001) (Figure 1). ICUs with a protocol/guideline for intubated PP increased from 27 (50%) to 43 (92%) (p< 0.001);ICUs that had trained some or all nurses in intubated PP increased from 34 (63%) to 45 (96%) (p<0.001). In contrast to 2019, in 2021 there were no associations between availability of intubated PP and hospital/ICU bed number, teaching status, nonprofit status, or case-mix index. In 2021, 43 (92%) of Massachusetts ICUs had adopted awake PP, 19 of whom had not adopted routine PP of intubated patients in 2019, and 4 of whom had not adopted intubated PP in 2021. Conclusions. There was a significant increase in the proportion of Massachusetts ICUs that had adopted evidence-based, guideline-recommended PP in intubated patients by 2021. At the same time, almost all ICUs also adopted non-evidence-based PP in awake patients. Our results illustrate that factors other than available evidence play a large role in practice adoption.","PeriodicalId":275484,"journal":{"name":"C24. ARDS: BASIC SCIENCE TO THE BEDSIDE","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C24. ARDS: BASIC SCIENCE TO THE BEDSIDE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale. Prone positioning (PP) of patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an evidence-based and guideline-recommended practice, but our 2019 survey found that fewer than half of Massachusetts ICUs could routinely offer PP. As studies have described rapid adoption of evidence- and nonevidence- based practices alike during COVID-19, we re-surveyed Massachusetts ICUs in 2021 to determine if institutional-level adoption of PP among intubated patients had changed during the COVID-19 pandemic;we additionally ascertained adoption of awake PP. Methods. In follow-up to our 2019 survey, we surveyed intensive care units (ICUs) at all acute-care hospitals in Massachusetts, June-October 2021. The survey asked: “Does your ICU have the ability to prone intubated patients?” (“Yes, routinely,” “Case-by-case,” or “No”). Follow-up questions inquired if ICUs had protocols/guidelines on intubated PP, trained nurses in intubated PP, and whether awake PP had been adopted. We collected descriptive hospital data (number of ICU and hospital beds, nonprofit status, teaching status, case-mix index) and tested for associations with chi-square tests. Results. Of the 57 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts with ICUs, 47 responded to the survey (82% response;compared to 54/60 [90%] in 2019;three hospitals surveyed in 2019 had closed ICUs in 2021). The number of hospitals able to routinely perform PP in intubated patients increased from 24 (44%) to 39 (83%);hospitals able to perform PP among intubated patients on a case-by-case basis or not at all decreased from 15 (28%) to 5 (11%) and 15 (28%) to 3 (6%), respectively (p<0.001) (Figure 1). ICUs with a protocol/guideline for intubated PP increased from 27 (50%) to 43 (92%) (p< 0.001);ICUs that had trained some or all nurses in intubated PP increased from 34 (63%) to 45 (96%) (p<0.001). In contrast to 2019, in 2021 there were no associations between availability of intubated PP and hospital/ICU bed number, teaching status, nonprofit status, or case-mix index. In 2021, 43 (92%) of Massachusetts ICUs had adopted awake PP, 19 of whom had not adopted routine PP of intubated patients in 2019, and 4 of whom had not adopted intubated PP in 2021. Conclusions. There was a significant increase in the proportion of Massachusetts ICUs that had adopted evidence-based, guideline-recommended PP in intubated patients by 2021. At the same time, almost all ICUs also adopted non-evidence-based PP in awake patients. Our results illustrate that factors other than available evidence play a large role in practice adoption.
医院级别俯卧位的可用性,2019年与2021年
基本原理。中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的俯卧位(PP)是一种循证和指南推荐的做法,但我们2019年的调查发现,马萨诸塞州不到一半的icu可以常规提供俯卧位。正如研究描述的那样,在COVID-19期间,快速采用了基于证据和非证据的做法,我们于2021年重新调查了马萨诸塞州的icu,以确定在COVID-19大流行期间,插管患者的机构级PP采用是否发生了变化;我们还确定了清醒PP的采用。在我们2019年的调查之后,我们于2021年6月至10月对马萨诸塞州所有急性护理医院的重症监护病房(icu)进行了调查。调查问道:“你们的ICU有能力让插管病人俯卧吗?(“是的,通常”、“具体情况具体分析”或“不是”)。随访问题包括icu是否有插管PP的协议/指南,接受过插管PP培训的护士,是否采用清醒PP。我们收集了描述性医院数据(ICU和医院床位数量、非营利性状况、教学状况、病例组合指数),并用卡方检验检验相关性。结果。在马萨诸塞州设有icu的57家急症护理医院中,有47家回应了调查(82%的回应;而2019年为54/60[90%];2019年接受调查的三家医院在2021年关闭了icu)。医院的数量能够经常执行页在气管插管病人从24(44%)上升到39(83%);医院能够执行页气管插管患者在个案基础上或不降低15(28%)5(11%)和15(28%)到3(6%),分别为(p < 0.001)(图1)。icu的协议/指导插管PP从27(50%)增加到43 (92%)(p < 0.001); icu的部分或全部培训护士插管PP从34(63%)增加到45 (96%)(p < 0.001)。与2019年相比,2021年插管PP的可用性与医院/ICU床位数、教学状况、非营利状况或病例组合指数之间没有关联。2021年,马萨诸塞州43家icu(92%)采用清醒PP, 2019年未采用插管患者常规PP的有19家,2021年未采用插管PP的有4家。结论。到2021年,马萨诸塞州icu在插管患者中采用循证、指南推荐的PP的比例显著增加。同时,几乎所有icu也对清醒患者采用非循证PP。我们的结果表明,除了现有证据之外,其他因素在实践采用中起着很大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信