Western esotericism: the new generation

Pavel Nosachev
{"title":"Western esotericism: the new generation","authors":"Pavel Nosachev","doi":"10.15382/sturi202299.93-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an overview of the development of research on Western esotericism in the works of the younger generation of scientists in 2010-2021, the works of E. Asprem, Y. Strube, L. Saif are primarily distinguished. At the beginning, a general outline of the current state of esotericism research is given, then the analysis of the attitude of the younger generation to the works of the classics is carried out, the criticism of the main ideas of W. Hanegraaff. Then the critique of the category of Western esotericism is analyzed on three points: the construction of categories of Islamic esotericism, the artificiality of the opposition esotericism - occultism, the construction of the term \"Western esotericism\". It is demonstrated that the division into ethic and emic categories actually turns out to be conditional, and the modern conceptual foundations of theories rest in the esoteric teachings of the middle of the XIX century. The critique of the concept of esotericism as rejected knowledge is analyzed separately. Then an overview of the positive program of new generation of researchers is given, in which two directions are fixed: race and gender. In conclusion, a critical examination of the pros and cons of the program of the new generation of esotericism researchers is carried out. It is concluded that the criticism of the works of the classics presented by the new generation is successful and well-founded, but the fascination with postmodern theories often reduces the novelty of their works to defending neoliberal values, multiculturalism, racial and gender equality, deconstruction of large narratives.","PeriodicalId":170812,"journal":{"name":"St.Tikhons' University Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St.Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi202299.93-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the development of research on Western esotericism in the works of the younger generation of scientists in 2010-2021, the works of E. Asprem, Y. Strube, L. Saif are primarily distinguished. At the beginning, a general outline of the current state of esotericism research is given, then the analysis of the attitude of the younger generation to the works of the classics is carried out, the criticism of the main ideas of W. Hanegraaff. Then the critique of the category of Western esotericism is analyzed on three points: the construction of categories of Islamic esotericism, the artificiality of the opposition esotericism - occultism, the construction of the term "Western esotericism". It is demonstrated that the division into ethic and emic categories actually turns out to be conditional, and the modern conceptual foundations of theories rest in the esoteric teachings of the middle of the XIX century. The critique of the concept of esotericism as rejected knowledge is analyzed separately. Then an overview of the positive program of new generation of researchers is given, in which two directions are fixed: race and gender. In conclusion, a critical examination of the pros and cons of the program of the new generation of esotericism researchers is carried out. It is concluded that the criticism of the works of the classics presented by the new generation is successful and well-founded, but the fascination with postmodern theories often reduces the novelty of their works to defending neoliberal values, multiculturalism, racial and gender equality, deconstruction of large narratives.
西方神秘主义:新一代
本文概述了2010-2021年年轻一代科学家作品中西方神秘主义研究的发展,主要以E. Asprem、Y. Strube、L. Saif的作品为代表。本文首先概述了隐密主义研究的现状,然后分析了年轻一代对经典作品的态度,对汉尼格拉夫的主要思想进行了批判。然后从三个方面分析了对西方神秘主义范畴的批判:伊斯兰神秘主义范畴的建构、与之对立的神秘主义的人造性、“西方神秘主义”一词的建构。它证明了伦理和学科范畴的划分实际上是有条件的,理论的现代概念基础是在十九世纪中期的深奥教义中建立的。对作为被拒绝的知识的神秘主义概念的批判是单独分析的。然后概述了新一代研究人员的积极计划,其中两个方向是固定的:种族和性别。总之,对新一代神秘主义研究人员计划的利弊进行了批判性检查。结论是,新一代对经典作品的批判是成功的、有根据的,但对后现代理论的迷恋往往将其作品的新颖性降低为捍卫新自由主义价值观、多元文化主义、种族和性别平等、解构大叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信