Psychosoziale Intervention: Über Bedarf, Akzeptanz und Machbarkeit in der pädiatrischen Onkologie

T. Zimmermann
{"title":"Psychosoziale Intervention: Über Bedarf, Akzeptanz und Machbarkeit in der pädiatrischen Onkologie","authors":"T. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1159/000528214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Psychosocial screening is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there is limited information about how to intervene after screening. This pilot trial aimed to determine feasibility of the novel Enhanced Psychosocial Screening Intervention (EPSI) and explore its preliminary efficacy outcomes. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability, and monthly distress screening completion, as well as exploratory efficacy outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: depression, anxiety and fatigue; distress thermometer, pain and sleep). Methods Parallel-group randomized pilot trial: Caregiver-youth (10–17 years at enrollment, newly diagnosed with cancer) dyads were randomly allocated to either EPSI or standard care with 1:1 ratio allocation. EPSI consists of having a Psychosocial Navigator who shares screening results conducted near diagnosis and monthly for one year with treating teams and families, and provides recommendations tailored to screening results. Results Enrollment rate was 54% (38 dyads); retention was 90% and acceptability 86% (caregivers) and 76% (youth). Exploratory symptoms of depression, anxiety, distress and fatigue outcomes consistently improved mainly for caregivers. Conclusions Results suggest EPSI is feasible and acceptable and exploratory mental and physical efficacy outcomes are promising for use in a future confirmatory multisite efficacy trial.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Psychosocial screening is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there is limited information about how to intervene after screening. This pilot trial aimed to determine feasibility of the novel Enhanced Psychosocial Screening Intervention (EPSI) and explore its preliminary efficacy outcomes. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability, and monthly distress screening completion, as well as exploratory efficacy outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: depression, anxiety and fatigue; distress thermometer, pain and sleep). Methods Parallel-group randomized pilot trial: Caregiver-youth (10–17 years at enrollment, newly diagnosed with cancer) dyads were randomly allocated to either EPSI or standard care with 1:1 ratio allocation. EPSI consists of having a Psychosocial Navigator who shares screening results conducted near diagnosis and monthly for one year with treating teams and families, and provides recommendations tailored to screening results. Results Enrollment rate was 54% (38 dyads); retention was 90% and acceptability 86% (caregivers) and 76% (youth). Exploratory symptoms of depression, anxiety, distress and fatigue outcomes consistently improved mainly for caregivers. Conclusions Results suggest EPSI is feasible and acceptable and exploratory mental and physical efficacy outcomes are promising for use in a future confirmatory multisite efficacy trial.
心理社会干预:儿科肿瘤学中需求,接受和可能性
目的心理社会筛查是儿科肿瘤学的标准治疗方法,但关于筛查后如何干预的信息有限。本试验旨在确定新型增强社会心理筛查干预(EPSI)的可行性,并探讨其初步疗效结果。我们检查了招募率、保留率、干预可接受性、每月窘迫筛查的完成率,以及探索性疗效结果(患者报告的结果测量信息系统:抑郁、焦虑和疲劳;痛苦温度计,疼痛和睡眠)。方法平行组随机试验:护理人员-青年(入组时10-17岁,新诊断为癌症)以1:1的比例随机分配到EPSI或标准护理组。EPSI由心理社会导航员组成,该导航员在诊断前和一年内每月与治疗团队和家庭分享筛查结果,并根据筛查结果提供量身定制的建议。结果入组率为54%(38对);保留率为90%,可接受性为86%(护理人员)和76%(青少年)。探索性抑郁、焦虑、痛苦和疲劳症状的改善主要针对照顾者。结论EPSI是可行和可接受的,探索性心理和生理疗效结果有望用于未来的验证性多地点疗效试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信