Effective Extraction of a Heavy Oil Resource by an Environmentally Friendly Green Solvent: Limonene.

T. A. Mathews, Paul Azzu, J. Cortes, B. Hascakir
{"title":"Effective Extraction of a Heavy Oil Resource by an Environmentally Friendly Green Solvent: Limonene.","authors":"T. A. Mathews, Paul Azzu, J. Cortes, B. Hascakir","doi":"10.2118/210138-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global oil consumption is predicted to increase by 15% from 2021 to 2050. The increasing oil demand and decreasing conventional oil supply force us to find alternate energy supplies. The key to this problem lies with the vast untapped heavy oil and bitumen resources. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of an environmentally friendly solvent, limonene, in recovering heavy oil.\n Three core flood experiments representing three different recovery methods were carried out. These include steam flooding (E1), solvent flooding (E2), and solvent-steam co-injections (E3). The green solvent, limonene, is a citrus-based non-toxic solvent. It was chosen due to its high organic solvency and ready availability. Throughout the experiments, steam was injected at a cold water equivalent of 18 ml/min, while limonene was injected at 2 ml/min. The experiments were run with a back pressure of 45-55 psi. The core pack was prepared by filling the pore space of Ottawa sand with a 60% heavy oil sample and 40% water by volume (including water percentage in oil). Produced oil and water samples were collected every 20 min during the experiments. These samples were further analyzed by emulsion characterization to determine emulsion stability and oil quality. Spent rock analyses were done to calculate the displacement efficiency of each of the experiments. In addition, an economic analysis was done to determine the optimal recovery method.\n Spent rock analysis showed that a sole injection of limonene (E2) had the highest oil recovery. This confirms the high organic solvency of limonene achieved miscible flooding producing about 46 vol % from a total of 60 vol % initial oil. Steam flooding (E1), on the other hand, did not perform as well, producing around 29 vol %. The post-mortem sample from E1 indicated asphaltene precipitation which could have lowered oil recovery. Co-injection of limonene and steam was expected to yield the highest recovery due to the presence of two active drive mechanisms, thermal and miscible flooding. However, it performed comparatively less (41 vol %) than a sole injection of limonene (E2). This is further explained with emulsion characterization results. Experiments involving steam (E1 and E2) revealed strong emulsions in the oil produced, indicating a lower quality.\n Furthermore, it was seen that the solvent-steam process produced weaker emulsions compared to steam flooding alone. On the other hand, solvent flooding (E2) produced high-quality oil with little to no emulsions. These results along with the economic analysis, indicate that the optimal recovery method would be solvent flooding (E2).\n Our results prove that limonene is a promising organic solvent. Limonene is non-toxic, readily available, and safe to handle. As a result, it can be a safe green alternative to commonly used toxic organic solvents such as toluene.","PeriodicalId":223474,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210138-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global oil consumption is predicted to increase by 15% from 2021 to 2050. The increasing oil demand and decreasing conventional oil supply force us to find alternate energy supplies. The key to this problem lies with the vast untapped heavy oil and bitumen resources. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of an environmentally friendly solvent, limonene, in recovering heavy oil. Three core flood experiments representing three different recovery methods were carried out. These include steam flooding (E1), solvent flooding (E2), and solvent-steam co-injections (E3). The green solvent, limonene, is a citrus-based non-toxic solvent. It was chosen due to its high organic solvency and ready availability. Throughout the experiments, steam was injected at a cold water equivalent of 18 ml/min, while limonene was injected at 2 ml/min. The experiments were run with a back pressure of 45-55 psi. The core pack was prepared by filling the pore space of Ottawa sand with a 60% heavy oil sample and 40% water by volume (including water percentage in oil). Produced oil and water samples were collected every 20 min during the experiments. These samples were further analyzed by emulsion characterization to determine emulsion stability and oil quality. Spent rock analyses were done to calculate the displacement efficiency of each of the experiments. In addition, an economic analysis was done to determine the optimal recovery method. Spent rock analysis showed that a sole injection of limonene (E2) had the highest oil recovery. This confirms the high organic solvency of limonene achieved miscible flooding producing about 46 vol % from a total of 60 vol % initial oil. Steam flooding (E1), on the other hand, did not perform as well, producing around 29 vol %. The post-mortem sample from E1 indicated asphaltene precipitation which could have lowered oil recovery. Co-injection of limonene and steam was expected to yield the highest recovery due to the presence of two active drive mechanisms, thermal and miscible flooding. However, it performed comparatively less (41 vol %) than a sole injection of limonene (E2). This is further explained with emulsion characterization results. Experiments involving steam (E1 and E2) revealed strong emulsions in the oil produced, indicating a lower quality. Furthermore, it was seen that the solvent-steam process produced weaker emulsions compared to steam flooding alone. On the other hand, solvent flooding (E2) produced high-quality oil with little to no emulsions. These results along with the economic analysis, indicate that the optimal recovery method would be solvent flooding (E2). Our results prove that limonene is a promising organic solvent. Limonene is non-toxic, readily available, and safe to handle. As a result, it can be a safe green alternative to commonly used toxic organic solvents such as toluene.
环保型绿色溶剂柠檬烯萃取稠油资源的研究
预计从2021年到2050年,全球石油消费量将增长15%。石油需求的增加和常规石油供应的减少迫使我们寻找替代能源供应。这一问题的关键在于大量未开发的重油和沥青资源。在本研究中,我们研究了一种环保溶剂柠檬烯在回收重油中的有效性。进行了3次岩心洪水试验,分别代表3种不同的采收率方法。这些方法包括蒸汽驱(E1)、溶剂驱(E2)和溶剂蒸汽共注入(E3)。绿色溶剂柠檬烯是一种基于柑橘类的无毒溶剂。选择它是因为它的高有机偿付能力和现成的可用性。在整个实验过程中,以相当于18 ml/min的冷水注入蒸汽,以2 ml/min的冷水注入柠檬烯。实验在45-55 psi的背压下进行。通过将60%的稠油样品和40%的体积水(包括油中水的百分比)填充渥太华砂的孔隙空间来制备岩心充填。实验过程中每隔20分钟采集一次采出油样和水样。对这些样品进行了进一步的乳状液表征,以确定乳状液的稳定性和油质。对废岩进行了分析,计算了各试验的位移效率。并进行了经济分析,确定了最佳回收方法。废岩分析表明,单注柠檬烯(E2)采收率最高。这证实了柠檬烯的高有机溶解度实现了混相驱,从60 vol %的初始油中开采出约46 vol %。另一方面,蒸汽驱(E1)的表现不佳,产量约为29 vol %。E1的尸检样本显示沥青质沉淀可能降低了采收率。由于存在热驱和混相驱两种驱动机制,柠檬烯和蒸汽共注入有望获得最高的采收率。然而,与单独注射柠檬烯(E2)相比,它的表现相对较少(41 vol %)。这可以用乳液表征结果进一步解释。用蒸汽(E1和E2)进行的实验表明,产出的油中有很强的乳剂,表明质量较低。此外,还发现溶剂-蒸汽工艺产生的乳液比单独蒸汽驱弱。另一方面,溶剂驱(E2)产生的油质量高,几乎没有乳状液。这些结果和经济分析表明,最佳的开采方法是溶剂驱(E2)。结果表明,柠檬烯是一种很有前途的有机溶剂。柠檬烯是无毒的,容易获得,安全处理。因此,它是一种安全的绿色替代品,可以替代常用的有毒有机溶剂,如甲苯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信